Anna Clarke
@annaclarke.bsky.social
7K followers 2.3K following 4.5K posts
Policy and Public Affairs at The Housing Forum. Interested in UK housing policy, planning, economics, housebuilding, energy, social policy. Views are my own. Cambridge based. https://housingforum.org.uk/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
annaclarke.bsky.social
The ban on non-locals buying newbuild homes of course does nothing to stop people buying second homes - they just buy up the existing housing stock, as older houses tend to be more popular as holiday homes anyway.
annaclarke.bsky.social
So Farage wants to scrap double council tax on second homes - a policy that's been working well to raise more money for councils and also free up more homes for locals. And instead ban new homes from being sold to anyone not already local - a policy shown to grind housebuilding to virtually zero?
annaclarke.bsky.social
Just googled it and yes you're right. Cambridge, where I live, stopped using it last year and I'd assumed that was everywhere, but seems some councils are still using it.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Not any more - Glyphosate got banned.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Students could leave if they wanted. Parents wouldn't be able to get a mortgage to buy a house for their child and friends, and would have to charge rent-controlled rents and not evict (or sell to the child and friends, or to the council). See www.greencoordinate.co.uk/motions/abol...
Abolish Landlords (#10) • Green Party Conference Agenda
www.greencoordinate.co.uk
annaclarke.bsky.social
They seem to be talking about some form of contribution-based ESA.
annaclarke.bsky.social
The savings depend upon how many move to means tested benefits instead though presumably?
annaclarke.bsky.social
Also, not allowed to end tenancies at the end of the academic year, or evict for any reason whatsoever. The students in private rentals would be bought up by councils and become council tenants. Next year's students will be asked to bring tents....
annaclarke.bsky.social
No I think only council would be social (possibly housing association too). So as a private landlord universities would be subject to rent controls, banned from borrowing money to build student housing, and forced to sell the rooms to students at a price that deducts all the rent they've ever paid.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Developed countries weren't flat for 40-50 years. They were declining quite consistently, apart from a few small blips.
annaclarke.bsky.social
I'm Asia it's tied up with a very competitive education system and sense among parents that you need to plough all your resources into one child or they won't succeed. Hugely damaging to the children, as well as putting their society on a fast track towards oblivion.
annaclarke.bsky.social
I'm not sure. Those look like blips to me on what is overall a very clear and strong global trend. Maybe not intractable but certainly in one overall direction currently.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Unlikely. At the moment - for all the tensions over it - migration from poorer countries to richer ones is overall a win win. I can see there being much more tensions when everyone's competing for workers.
annaclarke.bsky.social
World fertility rates are declining too, and fast. So migration is only a temporary patch to solve the high pensioner to working age ratio.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Depends whether you want an actual wealth tax to raise money. Or a fantasy wealth tax paid only by Somebody Else (and definitely not involving either houses or pensions because normal people own them)
annaclarke.bsky.social
I've not read that book I'm afraid. CPOs are certainly useful to councils assembling land for urban infill schemes. My understanding is that some make good use of them but others lack skills/confidence or are worried about legal challenge.
annaclarke.bsky.social
I could see a case for making it optional for 13-16. They often want id to get child train tickets etc. But making it compulsory seems something that could never gain support.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Not sure exactly what data there is on density of newbuild. But there are density targets in some local plans, or you could look at case studies of big schemes. Agree that we don't always push density as high as we could - even in London I've seen low-rise done to appease the local community.
annaclarke.bsky.social
I don't think it does really. Potential for densification depends massively on the built form, condition and tenure of the housing. (Very hard to change privately owned terraced housing, much more potential for council owned flats in poor condition)
annaclarke.bsky.social
The tricky thing is the scientific bodies can only advise from the perspective of "If your priority is X (disease prevention, protecting nature, etc) then you should do Y". But governments have to balance many priorities, so need the confidence to go against advice at times, and be open about why.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Yes, fair point. I guess looking at the density of newbuild/regen is possibly more insightful than bemoaning the low density built at historically.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Make the real ale £2 as a loss leader, but attract a younger crowd who are actually drinking expensive bottled lager?
annaclarke.bsky.social
I like a lot of Centre for Cities work, but found that one a bit theoretical. Yes our cities are less dense than in many other countries, but we can't turn it clock back and rebuild them. And densifying areas where people already live is massively more complex, costly and political.
annaclarke.bsky.social
Impact won't be massive (as funding is the biggest barrier to councils building more homes). But risk of losing them very quickly to the RTB does demotivate currently, as well as creating financial risk.