Ben Recht
@beenwrekt.bsky.social
7.3K followers 220 following 1.3K posts
Blog: https://argmin.substack.com/ Webpage: https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~brecht/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
beenwrekt.bsky.social
oh totally. The formatting that gives an air of authority.

It's funny how many word documents are uploaded on the bioRxiv. docx makes it clear that you shouldn't take what you are reading too seriously.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Maybe it would be better if we all gave up on arXiv and just wrote blogs. Not even sure if I'm joking.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
I know I'm mostly alone on this island, but I'm not sure the norms are of much help. That said, I'm open to new evidence if things are really getting out of hand.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
yes, but most published papers may as well have been blog posts.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
NGL: the duet with Hayley Williams hits me hard.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
It's been all downhill since Andy Rooney died.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
but there's (3) predictions of bad practice based on the iid model seldom pan out.

this is a lesson that I'd like social scientists to pay more attention to.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
OK, this is conflating two things (my fault).

(1) the iid assumption is a stupid crutch we use to apply the law of large numbers willy nilly
(2) in machine learning, all we know is that more data is better.

(1) applies to social science, (2) doesn't.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
I don't think I understand. Who is collecting small data from a non-adaptive system?
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Are they real problems, though? The evidence is far less clear than the replication police want you to believe.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Almost a decade ago, I coauthored a paper asking us to rethink our theory of generalization in machine learning. Today, I’m fine putting the theory back on the shelf.
Reshelving generalization
You don't need a theorem to argue more data is better than less data
www.argmin.net
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Astute. How do we break that cycle?
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Would be happy to discuss. Though I find myself confused more often than not every time I try to read a paper from either camp. They are all convinced that explanation lies in the models rather than in the training data.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
There's been a bifurcation into two camps, one in the FACCT orbit and one in the Less Wrong orbit, and they want different things.

Which camp were you interested in?
beenwrekt.bsky.social
I should give Brave a spin. I was using Arc, but the company pivoted to AI and abandoned their browser.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Kevin successfully shamed me into closing all of my tabs. And for that I am thankful.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
Yes. What is the diagnosis if I create dysfunctional to-do lists in multiple modalities?

I'm aware I need help.
beenwrekt.bsky.social
I'd die. Currently rocking 32.

Also, I am aware this is real Sicko shit...
beenwrekt.bsky.social
I'm always haunted by the splash image for your Boston Review essay.
A conversation. Or, Operation Head. By Niki Sublime. https://www.flickr.com/photos/nikisublime/221259238/
beenwrekt.bsky.social
I couldn't figure out how to elegantly work a citation into the main text, so I went with an oblique reference in the title. I'm going to add a couple of pointers at the end to your essays.