Connor Keating
@connortkeating.bsky.social
870 followers 100 following 26 posts
Junior Research Fellow at the University of Oxford researching emotion, social cognition, and autism | Co-director of the U21 Autism Research Network | He/him 🏳️‍🌈
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Connor Keating
alicia-rybicki.bsky.social
🚨 PhD Opportunity! 🚨

Come investigate the mechanistic role of dopamine in emotion processing with Prof Jennifer Cook - @thechbh.bsky.social @unibirmingham.bsky.social

MIBTP-funded PhD, using behavioural, computational and pharmacological approaches. Get in touch and please share!
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thus, unconscious rather than conscious attitudes may be more influential in guiding prosocial behaviour. These could be addressed – promoting greater acceptance of autistic people and reducing internalised stigma – to foster supportive relationships between & within neurotypes.
connortkeating.bsky.social
For autistic participants, stronger implicit biases predicted lower motivation to put in effort for autistic peers. For non-autistic participants, implicit biases did not affect decisions, but predicted greater effort exerted for non-autistic compared to autistic peers.
connortkeating.bsky.social
Implicit, but not explicit, biases held about autism played a role...
connortkeating.bsky.social
When looking at how much actual effort participants put in, non-autistic participants put in comparable effort for other autistic and non-autistic participants, whilst autistic participants put in more actual effort for their fellow autistic than non-autistic participants.
A bar chart showing that the non-autistic participants exerted more effort for themselves than for both other groups (with no differences between others of the same or others of a different neurotype). In contrast, the autistic participants exerted most effort for themselves, followed by autistic others, and then neurotypical others.
connortkeating.bsky.social
When looking at choices, we saw a robust self-bias, with both groups choosing to put in more effort for themselves than others, and no differences between same and different neurotype others.
A bar graph showing that both the autistic and non-autistic participants chose to exert effort more for themselves than for both other groups.
connortkeating.bsky.social
We asked autistic and non-autistic adults to squeeze a hand grip to earn credits for themselves, for others of the same neurotype, or for others of a different neurotype. They could choose to squeeze for credit or rest for no credit on every trial...
An image showing that participants completed trials where they could win a variable amount of credits for themselves, others of the same neurotype, or others of a different neurotype. Participants would choose whether or not to exert a given level of effort for the recipient, and then would have to put in that effort to win the reward.
Reposted by Connor Keating
craeioe.bsky.social
We are delighted that @connortkeating.bsky.social's Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism & Alexithymia #CRAEwebinar is now available to watch on our YouTube Channel.

youtu.be/OqbcUW6qbLw
Webinar image for Connor Keating's Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism & Alexithymia.  Photo of Connor. UCL header. Dated 2nd Oct 2025
Reposted by Connor Keating
craeioe.bsky.social
Our October #CRAEwebinar:
Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism, Alexithymia and Psychological Mechanisms.

@connortkeating.bsky.social will ask, do autistic & non-autistic adults process emotions differently once alexithymia is in the mix?
2nd Oct 4 pm BST

Sign up:
www.eventbrite.co.uk...
Demystifying Emotion-Processing: Autism & Alexithymia
Connor Keating considers whether emotion-processing differs between autistic and non-autistic adults after controlling for alexithymia.
www.eventbrite.co.uk
Reposted by Connor Keating
biancaaschuster.bsky.social
Very happy to report that this study is now published in Molecular Autism: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
biancaaschuster.bsky.social

Social interactions cannot be assessed without (1) acknowledging the two-way process involved and (2) the cultural context the interactions are embedded in. We present new evidence for this, using stimuli like the one below, in our latest preprint: osf.io/xg7y4 🤝
Reposted by Connor Keating
cjcrompton.bsky.social
New paper alert!

Information transfer within and between autistic and non-autistic people is out today in @nathumbehav.nature.com

nature.com/articles/s41...

THREAD! 🧵⬇️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thanks so much! ☺️☺️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thank you Jade! Hope everything is good with you ☺️☺️
connortkeating.bsky.social
I am incredibly honoured (and shocked) to receive the Best PhD Dissertation Award from INSAR! This work wouldn’t exist without amazing mentors, colleagues, lived experience experts and participants! Special thanks to Jennifer Cook for her incredible mentorship - I am so grateful for all the support!
connortkeating.bsky.social
And huge thanks to all of the people who made this work possible - particularly Jennifer Cook, Sophie Sowden-Carvalho, and the lived experience experts in Birmingham Psychology Autism Research Team! ✨✨✨
connortkeating.bsky.social
I’m so grateful for the opportunity to present my Frith Prize talk at the EPS meeting yesterday — it was such an honour and a delight! I had some fascinating questions and conversations that will definitely help shape my next projects. Huge thanks to @exppsychsoc.bsky.social for the fab conference!
An image of me presenting my talk. On the slide is a thank you to various people that helped make the work possible
Reposted by Connor Keating
biancaaschuster.bsky.social

Social interactions cannot be assessed without (1) acknowledging the two-way process involved and (2) the cultural context the interactions are embedded in. We present new evidence for this, using stimuli like the one below, in our latest preprint: osf.io/xg7y4 🤝
connortkeating.bsky.social
Thanks so much to the autism consultancy groups in Hong Kong, the UK, and the US for your help with our study - we are really grateful for your input.

Reposts to thread really appreciated ❤️
connortkeating.bsky.social
Our findings underscore the crucial need to combat misconceptions about, and stigma towards autism, particularly in Hong Kong🧵6/6
connortkeating.bsky.social
Knowledge and explicit stigma differed across countries, even after accounting for covariates: students in Hong Kong displayed less accurate knowledge, and higher explicit stigma towards autism, than those in the UK and US. Implicit biases did not differ across countries🧵5/6
Boxplots showing that (1) levels of autism-related knowledge was lower in Hong Kong than the UK and the US, and (2) levels of explicit stigma was higher in Hong Kong than the UK and the US, after accounting for covariates at p < .0001.
connortkeating.bsky.social
Implicit biases were directly predicted by age and explicit stigma. They were also indirectly predicted by vertical individualism (positively) and horizontal collectivism (negatively) via explicit stigma. Check out the paper for our speculations on the underlying mechanisms🧵4/6