Author | Lightnews

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1h

That's an odd way of admitting that you were wrong. 😂

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 5h

Agreed

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 5h

W R O N G

Rittenhouse originally traveled to Kenosha, where he had a secondary residence, on the 24th for work (RecPlex). He spent the night at a friend's house.
He didn't decide to volunteer until later that day (25th). Hours before his justified shootings.
It wasn't pre-planned.

4 1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 6h

🤣😂🤣😂
They are clearly triggered.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 6h

"intent to shoot someone"

Why did he run from every encounter?

There was no evidence presented during the trial to corroborate your claim.
Otherwise, PROVE IT.

That crucial piece of evidence eluded the prosecution despite 100's of potential witnesses & tons of video evidence.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 6h

What do you have against a clear case of self-defense?

Either you believe in self-defense or not.

Rittenhouse:
-Justifiably defended himself against unprovoked attacks.
-All supported by witness testimony & video evidence.
-No law(s) were violated.

4

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 11h

MAGATS? 😂

I was simply correcting your misinformation. Stop making everything political.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 13h

Huber was shot in the chest & Grosskreutz was shot in the bicep. Both were facing Rittenhouse.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 13h

"shooting at the back of man who was running away from him"

The facts don't support your claim.

1 1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 18h

Prison? 😂
Considering Kyle didn't break any laws, that would be absurd.

4

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 18h

Rittenhouse wasn't in possession of an automatic rifle. He was in possession of a SEMI-AUTO Smith & Wesson M&P 15-style rifle.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Unarmed ≠ Not a threat.
Rosenbaum & Huber attempted to disarm Kyle.
The term "unarmed" becomes irrelevant when that person is attempting to DISARM you.
Huber was utilizing his skateboard as a blunt force object.
Grosskreutz pointed a firearm at Kyle's head.

Context matters.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

I'll admit that your original statement lacked context as usual.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

It's restricted and generally requires a specific permit.
You claimed that every household has an automatic weapon. That's simply not true.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Stop making false claims & I won't correct you. 😂

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

"seeing a guy with a full auto rifle over his shoulder in a grocery store is common in Switzerland"

Both are highly restricted and generally require a specific permit. It's not common.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Rittenhouse was responsible. His trigger discipline & threat assessment were flawless.
He only neutralized those who attacked him first.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

"Most Swiss ppl have a full auto rifle in their house."

That's interesting considering they're outlawed.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Your posts show otherwise.

2

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Despite his denial, he doesn't approve of firearms or self-defense.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Agreed. Irrelevant to the conversation.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Yet, you're condoning the unprovoked attack on Rittenhouse by Rosenbaum in his attempt to disarm him.

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Then why post an irrelevant scenario? 😂

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

I've heard you. You despise firearms & encourage people to disarm those who are armed.

I'm basing my opinions on facts. You're basing yours on feelings & emotions.

1

factsbyjimmy.bsky.social @factsbyjimmy.bsky.social · 1d

Thanks for admitting that your example was irrelevant to the Rittenhouse situation.

Simply being armed in an open carry state amongst 100's of people who were similarly armed is NOT justification to disarm that person. Your views on firearms/open carry are not allowing you to remain impartial.

1 1