@h00pla434.bsky.social
48 followers 19 following 480 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
It would be actually, but you seem as allergic to acknowledging your own writing as Stancil.
Then why did he say No Kings was an order of magnitude bigger *on the scale of historically notable activism* which is not measured by number of participants?
Because that would be the question you actually answered.

Alternatively, you could stop being a coward and just answer the question that was asked.
The curse of being on the left is being right before liberals are willing to acknowledge it, and liberals hate that way more than being wrong.
Can you please quote the question asking if number of people participating is important to activism?

Because all I can see is the question you didn't answer asking if the notability of activist movements is measured by number of participants.
You seem to have answered a different question than the one that was asked.
HOLY SHIT!

I JUST REALIZED WE'RE LIVING THROUGH A FUCKING ANGRY BEAVERS JOKE!

It was literally a joke that the beavers gained musical stardom, called themselves bigger then sliced bread, and then claimed they were talking about how they are physically larger than a slice of bread.
His words were inaccurate, who measures the notability of activism by number of participants?
I think Will is just bad at coping with saying something stupid.
Enjoy your "win" in that lake of children's blood you wanted to swim in so very very much.
"order of magnitude" is a common euphemism for "so much more or less than what it is being compared to"
What's bad faith about parsing his post in its entirety where he claimed one was bigger on a scale measured by accomplishments and not number of participants?
Then why would he specify the scale he's using is something that would never be measured in number of participants?
I use "order of magnitude" for non-quantifiable things all the time.

"This burger is an order of magnitude more delicious than any other burger"

"Will Stancil is an order of magnitude more stupid than anyone else"
Please explain how parsing his post in its entirety instead of ignoring the fact that he explicitly stated one movement was bigger on a scale of historically notable activism, is jumping on the worst possible interpretation?
Some people are so lucky that self-awareness isn't necessary for bodily function, and they'll never know how lucky they are because of the lack of the aforementioned self-awareness.
"I should remind you that I'm still blaming you and not the child butchering monster, that I worship, for the consequences of my child butchering monster, that I worship, committing to genocide instead of trying to win an election."

Enjoy your blood, freak
Damn, Stancil fans are as sensitive as their idol
I'll be as cliche as your priors need me to be, I'm sure.

You gonna explain how ignoring someone who isn't engaging with him in the first place is succumbing to bullying?
Which isn't engaging with him.

He had to go around a block to get to those posts, it was not engaging with him.
The special treatment for a dead fascist on this site tells me that difference isn't as significant as I would like it to be
Have you considered reading the post that answers your question?
No, not the caricature you need communists to be, but actual communists
She didn't. You can tell by the complete lack of engaging with Will Stancil
Please explain how not responding to someone he has to go out of his way to respond to is succumbing to bullying