Heidi Moore
@heidim.bsky.social
160 followers 170 following 140 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
heidim.bsky.social
“We see the same trends globally: rule of law abused by those in control, free media silenced, critics imprisoned, and societies pushed towards authoritarian rule and militarisation. In 2024, more elections were held than ever before, but fewer and fewer are free and fair.”
heidim.bsky.social
“We see the same trends globally: rule of law abused by those in control, free media silenced, critics imprisoned, and societies pushed towards authoritarian rule and militarisation. In 2024, more elections were held than ever before, but fewer and fewer are free and fair.”
heidim.bsky.social
It appears that her niece used to live at the property in the indictment (her current address matches the zip in the Pulte referral). Aside from the Second Home Rider being flimsy, I’d also think renting to family (probably without much profit), will be viewed differently than an investment property
heidim.bsky.social
I’m saying the niece used to live at the property in the indictment - 3121 Peronne Ave. If the DOJ indicted James over renting to her niece, I understand why other attorneys did not want to bring charges (aside from other issues with the case).
heidim.bsky.social
The niece’s current address matches the zip code in the referral that Pulte sent over; the past address at 3121 Peronne Ave is the property in the indictment.
heidim.bsky.social
I wonder if she rented this property to her niece prior to the 2023 co-purchase?
heidim.bsky.social
Could a property management company qualify under that description? Here’s the Second Home Rider; it seems like there’s quite a bit of wiggle room here.

“…or unless extenuating circumstances exist that are beyond Borrower’s control.”
heidim.bsky.social
Thank you for explaining all this, Steve! I saw at the round table event earlier today that Trump is floating the idea of labeling Antifa as a FTO. Is he able to do that, and if so, I’m guessing it makes this spectacle a whole lot worse?
heidim.bsky.social
I’m sure it’s no coincidence that the people he constantly refers to as low IQ also happen to be Black.
heidim.bsky.social
This brought back a memory I didn’t even know I had! 🤣
heidim.bsky.social
Great piece by @stevevladeck.bsky.social here (his insight on these matters is always appreciated)!

“Until this year, Congress’s 230-year-old choice had been borne out. Presidents of both parties have been especially careful to use the military domestically…”
stevevladeck.bsky.social
The federal government does and should have the authority to deploy troops into our cities—even without local consent—*when the circumstances actually warrant it.*

In @nytopinion.nytimes.com, me on why the real issue in Portland, Chicago, and elsewhere is the missing / contrived factual predicate:
Opinion | No, Trump Can’t Deploy Troops to Wherever He Wants
www.nytimes.com
heidim.bsky.social
We’re so back, Mike!
heidim.bsky.social
I meant that the original TRO only stated that ORNG could not be federalized (definitely agree they were trying to circumvent her order by sending other states’ NG), so from a contempt standpoint, did they actually defy her order? She had to issue a new TRO blocking all other federalized NGs.
heidim.bsky.social
She was not having it with anything the DOJ attorney was saying (and he sounded like a, deservedly, scolded child at the beginning of the call).

“You are an officer of the court.” 😳
heidim.bsky.social
She was not having it with anything the DOJ attorney was saying (and he sounded like a, deservedly, scolded child at the beginning of the call).
heidim.bsky.social
She was not having it with anything the DOJ was saying.
heidim.bsky.social
Judge Immergut has set a hearing for 7pm Pacific Time tonight!
heidim.bsky.social
This NY Post headline choice was shocking to see!
heidim.bsky.social
I’m shocked to see this headline choice from the NY Post. Do you agree that he’s defying a court order? It surely seems like a childish way to avoid the ruling, but the ruling pertains only to the OR National Guard, not CA?
heidim.bsky.social
I believe that’s what he’s saying. They were given non-judicial administrative powers, but couldn’t adjudicate the merits of the decision…which doesn’t make sense?
heidim.bsky.social
I mean district *courts* were created in 1789, each led by a district *judge,* so when Congress enacted the Calling Forth Act in 1792, surely they didn’t mean to exclude courts when say “by an associate justice or the district judge.” What is he even doing here??
heidim.bsky.social
Steve, Gov Newsom is stating that 300 CA NG troops are being deployed to OR under Trump’s order. I reread your great piece on Illinois v. Texas, but in that case Texas was willing to send the NG. I’m assuming that the CA NG are federalized, so I don’t think SCOTUS’ original jurisdiction could apply?