I agree with choice. It's just some actions work at cross purposes. When dealing with fascists, I am stuck in looking at what worked historically. Let the fascists take care of their own.
Wait till you hear about the invisible magic man in the sky who told him he could have certain land if he committed antisemitic (Canaanites were semitic) genocide and took it, and he did, and that forms the basis for claims today. What a guy!
I've heard there is an alternative to Trump's Little Johnson. If that is true, and it's not being used, then those who fail to use it are no better than Trump's Little Johnson. They can STFU.
Always looking for evidence that relief is a greater motivator than pain, short term and/or long term. Am I doing what Trump wants me to do? Am I making his point for him? It may seem he is living in my head, but the enemy does have a vote. I'd hate to deprive him of his rope needed to hang himself.
And even if their actions are within their official functions, we reserve the right to change the law after the fact, wipe our asses with the Constitution, and impose justice. Because you knew better.
I've long said, every philanthropic dollar spent relieves government of an obligation, freeing it up to do the dirty work of plutocrats. I'm usually talking about all the touchy-feely stuff done to make people love us. Perhaps this will better make the same point. Hey, it's cheaper than paying taxes
I wondered how long & how much Trump's cucks would try to cover for him, in the hopes he was right, or because they actually love him. But good business dictates you pass on costs. Sometimes philanthropy is cheaper than paying taxes, but that only goes so far.
Establishment D's are anointed. I understand the positive benefits of Party, but once a candidate passes muster with the people, then the Party needs to show some GD respect.
