Solomon Eseme
banner
kaperskyguru.bsky.social
Solomon Eseme
@kaperskyguru.bsky.social
23 followers 15 following 1.4K posts
I help you become a great backend engineer | ceo @Masteringbackend.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
That’s why Java developers rarely worry about “what’s next.” The stack they use already powers the systems that define the internet

And that’s what you’ll master inside this course, the real-world skills companies trust to run their most critical systems

masteringbackend.com/courses/bec...
Advanced Java + Spring Course: Become A Java + Spring Backend Engineer
Advanced Java + Spring Course for Backend Engineers: All-in-one Java and Spring course for learning backend engineering with Java. This comprehensive course is designed for Java developers seeking proficiency in Java.
masteringbackend.com
Java sits in the sweet spot:

- Strong performance
- Mature tooling
- Massive community
- Enterprise adoption
- Proven frameworks like Spring Boot

It’s not hype-driven. It’s production-driven.
Python wins on simplicity — but at scale, performance becomes a bottleneck.

That’s why most machine learning pipelines are served by Java backends, even if they’re trained in Python.
Go is modern, clean, and great for microservices.

But it still lacks the vast ecosystem Java has built over 25 years.

In Java, almost every problem has a stable, mature library or framework waiting for you.
Node.js is fast to build with.

But it struggles when applications need strict typing, deep multithreading, or massive concurrency.

Java thrives there — thanks to the JVM’s battle-tested design.
Every backend developer faces this question at some point:

Should I learn Java, Node.js, Go, or Python?

Each has strengths.

But let’s look at what really makes Java stand out — especially for building systems that last.
The best backend engineers know how to reason about these trade-offs, not just pick a database, but explain why.

That’s what separates system builders from framework users.
Neither choice is “wrong.”

The key is understanding what your users value more.

- Banking? Choose consistency.
- Social feeds? Choose availability.
- Logging or analytics? Choose partition tolerance and throughput.

Architecture is trade-offs, not absolutes.
CP systems sacrifice uptime for accuracy.
AP systems sacrifice freshness for speed.
So your choice is always between Consistency and Availability

Example:

- CP systems (Consistency first): Spanner, MongoDB (with strong consistency), PostgreSQL clusters
- AP systems (Availability first): Cassandra, DynamoDB, Riak
The CAP theorem says you can only pick 2 of 3 guarantees

- Consistency: All nodes see the same data
- Availability: Every request gets a response
- Partition tolerance: The system continues despite network failures

Partition tolerance isn’t optional — networks will fail.
In a perfect world, every service would always agree on the same data.

But in the real world, networks fail, servers crash, and replicas lag.

The moment you distribute your system, you invite the CAP theorem into your life.
Every backend engineer eventually faces the same painful trade-off:

Consistency vs. Availability.

You can’t have both perfectly in a distributed system.

But do you really understand why? Let’s unpack it.
The solution

- Build one project a day.
- Even small ones.
- Each one teaches you something new: databases, routes, errors, and deployment.

Do this for 30 days, and you’ll feel the shift. From “learner” → “engineer.”
Why most never make it past this stage

Because building from scratch is hard.

It’s confusing. It’s messy. You’ll fail a lot.

But that’s exactly what prepares you for real backend work.
Knowing what an API is is not the same as building one that scales

Knowing what authentication means is not the same as implementing JWT securely

Knowing SQL is not the same as designing schemas that actually work

You dont learn those from videos. U learn them by shipping code
Most developers confuse consuming information with gaining experience.

But recruiters don’t hire what you know — they hire what you’ve done.

You can’t “tutorial” your way into a real job.

You need projects.
You can know Python.

You can know Flask.

You can even know databases, REST, and Docker...

And still not land a backend job.

Here’s the hard truth no tutorial tells you 🧵
You can’t learn this from random tutorials.

You need structured, real-world projects that simulate actual backend challenges, the kind where every choice matters.

That’s how you go from Python developer → backend engineer.
And here’s the secret no one tells you — backend engineers don’t know everything.

They just know how to think about trade-offs.

- SQL or NoSQL?
- Async or sync?
- Docker or bare metal?

Every decision impacts scalability, cost, and complexity.

That’s the skill you’re missing.
Real backend engineering looks like this:

- Designing APIs that talk to databases
- Handling errors gracefully
- Writing tests before deployment
- Monitoring logs after release

In short, you’re building for reliability, not just “it works.”
The biggest mistake Python learners make?

They learn sequentially (syntax → functions → classes) instead of contextually (project → problems → solutions).

You don’t grow by memorizing syntax.

You grow by building and debugging systems.