Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
@sardarji.bsky.social
360 followers 480 following 3.8K posts
🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
rparloff.bsky.social
Though she doesn't generally do social media, Emily asked me to post this.
bsky.app/profile/anna...
sardarji.bsky.social
If you look hard enough you can find a gulli-danda league somewhere, I'm sure. A good father-son outing.
sardarji.bsky.social
Kav stop.

Some enterprising journalist should compile a list of these and send them to Justice Kavanaugh
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
olufemiotaiwo.bsky.social
The Sudan Solidarity Collective supports organizations led by Sudanese civilians: including emergency response rooms, mutual aid, labor and farmers’ unions. Please give what you can and/or share.
nisrinelamin.bsky.social
The Sudan Solidarity Collective is doing a big fundraising push to support our partners in El Fashir to support food distribution, evacuation and medications.

Please help us boost our support. Please share and donate 👇🏾 .

sudansolidarity.com
Home - Sudan Solidarity Collective
Solidarity with Sudan! Support the Emergency Response Rooms doing life saving work in Sudan by donating to the Sudan Solidarity Fund. Workshops4Sudan is a new fundraising initiative of the Sudan Solid...
sudansolidarity.com
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
daniellarison.bsky.social
In his foreign policy, Trump launches illegal attacks, murders people, and starts pointless and destructive trade wars. Is that what Douthat wants at home? Because he’s already getting it. www.nytimes.com/2025/10/11/o...
Opinion | Why Can’t Trump’s Domestic Policy Be More Like His Foreign Policy?
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
markjacob.bsky.social
I support legitimate law enforcement.
I do not support masked thugs terrorizing immigrants, tear-gassing protesters and assaulting reporters.
Trump is undermining respect for law enforcement and making us all less safe.
sardarji.bsky.social
The dissenting justices did not sign on to the majority opinion because they wanted to treat him with ivermectin
sardarji.bsky.social
Soldiers marching in formation?

Trump is jealous.
sardarji.bsky.social
Loomer does not approve. What's Hegseth's shelf life now?
sardarji.bsky.social
Guard should show up during Dreamforce and harass the attendees
sardarji.bsky.social
They're not worried about raising money and getting reelected
sardarji.bsky.social
Sorry, that was 9. You only asked for 8.
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
sardarji.bsky.social
Yes, take us 5x faster towards bankruptcy trying to realize my stupid vision in which social and commercial interactions will take place in some imaginary construct with hokey avatars.
sardarji.bsky.social
I always found men wearing cowboy hats and large sunglasses indoors pretty stupid.
sardarji.bsky.social
I wonder how he'd feel if the Guard harassed attendees at Dreamforce.
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
reichlinmelnick.bsky.social
UPDATE: Judge Perry issued an opinion explaining why she blocked the Texas National Guard deployment in Chicago.

She begins with Alexander Hamilton’s rejection of a “preposterous” idea that the Constitution lets a President deploy a State’s militia to a different State for political retribution. 🧵
OPINION AND ORDER
Since this country was founded, Americans have disagreed about the appropriate division
of power between the federal government and the fifty states that make up our Union. This
tension is a natural result of the system of federalism adopted by our Founders. And yet, not even
the Founding Father most ardently in favor of a strong federal government believed that one
state's militia could be sent to another state for the purposes of political retribution, calling such
a suggestion "inflammatory," and stating "it is impossible to believe that [a President] would employ such preposterous means to accomplish their designs." But Plaintiffs contend that such
an event has come to pass, and argue that National Guard troops from both Illinois and Texas
have been deployed to Illinois because the President of the United States wants to punish state elected officials whose policies are different from his own.
sardarji.bsky.social
TBH we should just move to a simple majority system in the Senate. It's not clear how the Dems benefit from the current arrangement
Reposted by Shai Hulud 🇺🇸 & 🇳🇬 & 🇮🇳
ringwiss.bsky.social
“And that’s why we nuked it twice in the past month.”
sardarji.bsky.social
Um, news to me that the filibuster is in the Constitution