SpinningHugo
@spinninghugo.bsky.social
8.5K followers 650 following 5.3K posts
Always ask yourself, what would Lord Diplock think? https://spinninghugo.wordpress.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
spinninghugo.bsky.social
But bloody hell his garden was cold in winter.

Thanks Bill.

/Ends
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Although he was decades older than me, he had a far more radical approach to law and how to assess it than I do.

He was one of our last links to a radical C20 era of reassessment of what the Victorians left us.

/2
spinninghugo.bsky.social
God yes. There was a 15-20 year period that, for me, was magical.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
"Giving reasons is bad..."

Imaginable that a Supreme Court in any other common law jurisdiction would do this.

What does that tell you?
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."
spinninghugo.bsky.social
British post war classical music was brilliant.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Which is best depends unfortunately on how rich you are. If you're rich, London is still imo by far the best.
Reposted by SpinningHugo
martinmckee.bsky.social
I grew up in Belfast during “The Troubles”. The highest number of deaths from violence was in 1972. That year the rate per million people was higher in Detroit, St Louis, Baltimore, and Washington
spinninghugo.bsky.social
It was, you know, good. Well done.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
"In the mid-town area?"

She was so funny. Obviously, clever and beautiful.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
It is one of the oddities of US contract law, that the second Restatement is so much worse than the first.

Law isn't always progress, "working itself pure."
spinninghugo.bsky.social
This is ridiculous. The authors should have just said no.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Why are we having this AI slop forced on us?

Sweet & Maxwell have always been a fairly grubby outfit, but this is a new low.

/ends
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Or this from the 14th showing the interesting image of The Peerless (amusingly we dont know which one).

/4
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Compare the 12th edition, with A Showing at Tattersalls on the cover.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Peel (the author) makes a good (law) joke about this in his preface:

"a depiction of Salisbury Cathedral, not by Constable, as was also the case in Leaf v International Galleries."

But he must be furious.

/2
spinninghugo.bsky.social
It is ridiculous that Sweet & Maxwell insist, contrary to the author's wishes and his willingness to pay for any cost, on having an AI image on their books.

/1
spinninghugo.bsky.social
Feel guilty "plagiarising" from something I wrote 20 years ago. Feels like cheating (I have no memory of writing some of this stuff).
spinninghugo.bsky.social
They managed to get away not just with Chitty on Contracts, but Dicey, Morris and Collins on Conflicts as well.
spinninghugo.bsky.social
[Law]

I don't always agree with him about everything, but this piece by Edelman J on statutory interpretation is truly excellent. You can, imo, apply it to the interpretation of any other legal words. Or indeed, words in general.

www.hcourt.gov.au/sites/defaul...
www.hcourt.gov.au
Reposted by SpinningHugo
thedailyshow.com
The following is REAL footage from Portland, 2025. Viewer discretion is advised.