Author | Lightnews

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · 11d

Wow that is just horrible for Braisaz, get all these tensions and drama to after 2 years have someone admit they just did it. Just can not imagine what made Simon do this.

1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · 20d

Conistently using the full name as well.

1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · 20d

Yes, and maybe JBB calls it a day to spend time with her family but everyone is young enough to keep going altleast one more cycle, most 2.

1 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · 21d

And not unimportant: 4 per event at the olympics, right? I foresee some trouble when choosing between JBB, Michelon and Richard or even Simon if she has a bad start to the season. Imagine if one of the up and coming athletes adds themselves to this list.

1 1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · 27d

Our GOAT

5

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Sep 14

Keep pushing the agenda I am very close to getting ragebaited.

1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 26

From my experience the habit is to take the nearest integer greater than half the number of riders 8 -> 5 6,7 -> 4. But it's the vuelta. I think it will be the bottle of the rider that left the startramp as 3rd.

1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 15

He's a beast, spent a junior race in the break with him. Had to go to the back and say I was eating because he pulled like crazy directly when I pulled off. Slot back in a few places later in a safer spot. This was a mostly flat classics race and he won a small group sprint with ease, solid climber.

1 1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 4

Also makes me appreciate books even more, the importance of correct publication makes the good ones well reviewed and well set up and for me a better educational tool than the internet.

2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 4

Yeah exactly if this is the future AI will actually benefit physicists, mathematicians and alike who do more own work and do not delegate simple tasks to general computers. Kind of the oppositie of its marketing. Just shows that tools need to be purposeful and validated for their usecase.

2 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 4

When I google parsec it is just conpletely wrong. I can't imagine how that could be anything other than an AI hallucination. Also can not find anything online about this mistake, wonder how many of these mistakes will suddenly occur in the future.

1 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Absolute love it, I have played with it and changed a few things in a separate branch. When I have time in a few days I will double check everything and push my branch remote such that you can take the parts of the branch you like!

1 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Today they had to waste energy early but yesterday they were 4 with the last 15-20 with Bunel ahead. They did not have a Labous but Nooijen and de Vries climbed great.

1 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

I'll also take a look, is it okay if I clone branch and do some suggestions?

1 1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Also on the powermeter, Ag-insurance is on shimano power meters which have a bit of a reputation of not being reliable.

2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

A small comment on your original calculation using 46.6 kg with a 6.8 kg bike. I only get 4.475 w/kg when you use Power/(bike_weight + person_weight) when using Power/person_weight I get 5.1. In general w/kg are calculated as power/person_weight.

1 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

I wouldn't trust powermeters to that degree. 50 kgs would make sense that would give 4.9 in my calcs and 4.8 on the powermeter. Add some drafting and some inescapable error in both powermeter and the calcs, seems pretty realistic.

2 1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Can't find a difference that explains almost .4 w/kg. I do have gear weight at 8 because of helmet and shoes etc. That could be 1-2 % difference. I do use potential energy instead of calculation via force and angle but have tested it and it does not change the result.

This is my code. Seemed very similar, if you are interested you can try to find the difference :).

1 2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Is it the same code you shared last time? Love the w/kg discussions. This is a lot more fun than just taking the LR numbers.

1 1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Did the same, most of the climb seemed relatively sheltered. Thought is was better not to guess.

1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

Wrote some code and this is what I'm getting. This agrees with my usual estimates(I almost always get etalon 0.1 - 0.2 lower than Naichaca, probably something with the assumptions)

3 components are calculated using standard formulas and then added. Afterwards drive train efficiency coeff is applied to the total.

1 1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Aug 3

How are the powers distributed across gravity drag etc? I'm getting around 4.9 at 60 kg etalon. Using E_grav = m*g*h and then dividend by time and rider weight I already get 4.35.

2

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Jul 31

Van Emden basically created that whole statement on: 'There should be more respect for leaders', think it mostly shows already existing tension.

1

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Jul 22

Think the leider going from 50 to 35 percent is not that relevant if you have domestiques going way up making it very hard to bring you back in the first place.

sten10.bsky.social @sten10.bsky.social · Jul 22

Think the diamond shape is the only one feasible, all the others would sacrifice way too many domestiques. Particularly with the increment in resistance from two riders riding next to each other. Would be interesting what would happen if you do this in the already disturbed air of the racecaravan.

1