SteveBev
@stevebev.bsky.social
1K followers 1.1K following 3.9K posts
BichonAtLaw aided by my occasionally useful human
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
stevebev.bsky.social
Bit peeved at persistent anti Garland disinformation so here’s a thread
With Hat Tips to @emptywheel.bsky.social and
@muellershewrote.bsky.social 🧵
stevebev.bsky.social
Time for SuperDon to start the 2026 Nobel pitch
🙄
stevebev.bsky.social
NPR article contains this statement:

“But she also acknowledged that she is a frequent target of criticism from fellow liberals”

Which encapsulates how fantastical and skewed the “analysis” is
stevebev.bsky.social
stevebev.bsky.social
@rparloff.bsky.social did a remarkable job live blogging the hearing, and reproducing the thread in text form is a public service.
Roger is correct the hearing was remarkable: Govt efforts to conceal their continuing bad faith towards Abrego were comprehensively dismantled by his assiduous lawyers.
rparloff.bsky.social
In the week ahead Judge Xinis may order well Abrego Garcia's release (triggering immediate emergency appeals). To see why, here's my live account for @lawfaremedia.org of Friday's remarkable evidentiary hearing—in either text form or original bsky thread. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/abre...
stevebev.bsky.social
@rparloff.bsky.social did a remarkable job live blogging the hearing, and reproducing the thread in text form is a public service.
Roger is correct the hearing was remarkable: Govt efforts to conceal their continuing bad faith towards Abrego were comprehensively dismantled by his assiduous lawyers.
rparloff.bsky.social
In the week ahead Judge Xinis may order well Abrego Garcia's release (triggering immediate emergency appeals). To see why, here's my live account for @lawfaremedia.org of Friday's remarkable evidentiary hearing—in either text form or original bsky thread. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/abre...
stevebev.bsky.social
Outstanding work by @rparloff.bsky.social

and it must be said by Abrego’s lawyers:

skewering the Govt utterly cynical efforts to abuse his rights and manipulate the process and evidence to pretend otherwise
stevebev.bsky.social
So after post/79

Have I got this right. Basically ICE/ERO have twiddled thumbs since July, had occasional conversations that didn’t go anywhere, didn’t keep a file, yet Govt position is “Abrego cd be removed in 72 hours to Eswatini/Ghana/Uganda” 🙄
Amirite 🤷‍♂️
stevebev.bsky.social
Indeed, and how do you expect Eswatini to abide by non refoulment of people effectively forced on them ?
Bonkers
stevebev.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/rpar...

Does this mean Eswatini have said no in the past but sort of relented when people put on plane anyway ⁉️
How well does that bode for nonrefoulement⁉️
rparloff.bsky.social
R: anything else mursky or anderson told you relevant to today?
S: anderson said eswatini said no, but conversations ongoing.
... but said no cases have been denied once manifest is sent over. ... that's the list of who's going on a flight.
R: manifest has nothing to do with MOU?
S: no.

/62
stevebev.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/rpar...

Eswatini has been arbitrarily detaining Jamaican nationals deported there by US for 2 months without access to lawyers.

Thighs is all a bit crap by ICE
rparloff.bsky.social
While bench conference proceeds, this is what @joshgerstein.bsky.social heard:

/43
stevebev.bsky.social
Excommunication was lenient then…
stevebev.bsky.social
A provocative and unnecessary post. Doom casting gets you excommunicated
stevebev.bsky.social
Was Roger initially unable to identify DE because he was shrouded in a miasma of lies?

Enquiring minds want an image of how this magus of malevolence makes his entry.
stevebev.bsky.social
Good point well made.
stevebev.bsky.social
Peace prize for a man who orders murder on the high seas ⁉️
Satire hasn’t simply died,
it got cremated with a hand-grenade
and the ashes got scattered to the 4 winds
stevebev.bsky.social
Have a well deserved day for yourself and family.

Hope all good with you all. Take it easy.
stevebev.bsky.social
bsky.app/profile/stev...
31:33 -32:39 Diplomatic and calculated Defence of Integrity as the guiding principle for the Peace Prize Decision, and why Trump didn’t win.
stevebev.bsky.social
www.youtube.com/live/9aYStJe...
Nobel committee chair Jørgen Watne Frydnes, to question re Trump lobbying effort to win the prize,replies

“committee receives thousands of letters each year,makes its decision in a room with portraits of
All past Laureates ..filled with both courage and integrity”👍
Winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize announced – watch live
YouTube video by Guardian News
www.youtube.com
stevebev.bsky.social
www.youtube.com/live/9aYStJe...
Nobel committee chair Jørgen Watne Frydnes, to question re Trump lobbying effort to win the prize,replies

“committee receives thousands of letters each year,makes its decision in a room with portraits of
All past Laureates ..filled with both courage and integrity”👍
Winner of the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize announced – watch live
YouTube video by Guardian News
www.youtube.com
stevebev.bsky.social
It’s not about what his duties ARE, #fn-3 is about A COMFORT ZONE ambit of immunity/impunity protecting the Presidency from having the robust exercise of its powers BEING QUESTIONED/EXAMINED—so Presidents are not hampered by the CONCERN of drawing limit of powers in the wrong place. #fn-3 = shit!!
stevebev.bsky.social
This is exactly the dilemma SCOTUS created for itself. #fn-3 is essentially exclusionary rule protecting the Presidency from embarrassment of evidence of misconduct being ‘published’ in court proceedings.
A possible remedy is to have in camera procedures for such matters, like CIPA.
stevebev.bsky.social
So whatever fn3 May mean it cannot be used to defeat a defendant’s constitutional rights.

And IF fn3 has an application to such a case as this, to prevent embarrassment of the Presidency by exposing in court complicity between the President and the DOJ

Then the remedy is for DOJ to dismiss!!!
stevebev.bsky.social
Contrary to the Bill of Rights and 14 Amendment
stevebev.bsky.social
their duty to act in good faith.
Further, the DOJ are not the Attorneys of the President.
Whatever the President’s policy priorities on criminal investigation and prosecution may be, selective and vindictive enforcement of the law is not a legitimate policy for DOJ to pursue, because it is