Ryan Miemczyk
@theimpactlab.co.uk
23K followers 2.5K following 1.4K posts
Accredited Researcher l Director of Research at Trust Impact l Chair at Manchester Young Lives & Trustee at the YMCA l Masters athlete for England. I help charities measure the important stuff https://linktr.ee/ryanmiemczyk
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
theimpactlab.co.uk
Have you seen good models or bad ones? If you work with SRS or IDS UK, what do your approvals / data sharing agreements say about downstream use and public benefit?

#ONS #SRS #ADRUK #OpenData #DataEthics #UKData #SocialImpact #GovTech #DataPolicy
theimpactlab.co.uk
My take:

✅ Yes to selling the value add
✅ Free: core indicators plus a short method note.
✅ Paid: faster updates, UX, support, API, bespoke analysis.

This keeps public benefit, and still rewards the work 💡
theimpactlab.co.uk
Question for the Researchers and Data folks:

Should companies be allowed to paywall ONS data (and not share the core results) despite access being granted on condition of 'benefiting the public?' 📊
theimpactlab.co.uk
Buzzing to be leading a couple of breakouts at The Future of Social Impact 🙌

⚡ How to design impact frameworks that actually get used
⚡ Data essentials for social impact

📅 Tues 18 Nov
🎟️ Tickets almost gone (<30 left)

👉 www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/the-future...
The Future of Social Impact
Explore what it takes to create real impact. Join us for a day of honest talks, hands-on tools and bold ideas for meaningful change.
www.eventbrite.co.uk
theimpactlab.co.uk
I’m currently looking for a panel member for a session I’m hosting at our conference on the 18th November.

I’m looking for an org that actively uses its impact framework as their North Star.

If you are or know someone, give me a shout!
theimpactlab.co.uk
If your charity wants to use postcode data without the GDPR headaches, I’m happy to share how this works or help you build your own version ⚙️

DM me 📩 or reply 💬

#DataForGood #CharityTech #GDPR
theimpactlab.co.uk
Why does “in the browser” matter? 🧐

Think of it like checking someone’s ID in their own house 🔑

You see it, take the info you need, and hand it straight back, nothing leaves with you.
theimpactlab.co.uk
Keep the insights but ditch the risk by building a browser-based tool that:

🔍 Looks up the postcode locally on the user’s device
📤 Only returns postcode sector + LSOA name + LSOA code
🌍 Links straight to area-level stats like deprivation, health, education
✅ Ensuring no postcode leaves the device
theimpactlab.co.uk
On average, a postcode covers ~15 homes 🏠

But there are:

🏡 Rural postcodes with just 2–3 houses
📮 55,000+ single-address postcodes in England & Wales
📦 Large-user postcodes for just one org or PO Box

In these cases, a full postcode can be identifiable data 🎯
theimpactlab.co.uk
👋 Charity friends 👋

One of the top GDPR questions I get is "Can we collect postcodes?"

The answer: sometimes ✅ sometimes ⚠️

And the risks are bigger than most people think (especially in rural areas)
theimpactlab.co.uk
Overall, I’m super impressed. DoE is showing that rigorous, transparent, and well-communicated impact measurement is possible at scale. They’re already doing so much right, but with sharper segmentation, they could lead the field even further. 🚀

(7/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
Imagine the power of being able to say,

“Young people from high deprivation areas experienced this level of improved wellbeing compared to their peers from lower deprivation areas.”

That’s where the real story lies. 💡

(6/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
A key opportunity for improvement would be stronger segmentation of their impact data.

For example, we need to see how outcomes differ by demographics like deprivation level, ethnicity, or region this is critical to understanding equity of access and impact. 🔧

(5/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
However, there’s a challenge that stood out.

More than 50% of participants come from areas of low deprivation (IMD 8-10: likely affluent areas).

While that isn’t inherently a bad thing, it raises questions about whether the programme is reaching those who might benefit the most? 🏙️↔️🏞️

(4/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
I also love how upfront they are about the sample, both in terms of who responded and how representative it is. Too many reports hide this detail in footnotes or ignore it entirely. The Duke of Edinburgh Award is setting a standard here. 🏅

(3/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
They’re using validated questions (like those from ONS wellbeing measures), which is such a refreshing change from the vague and untested indicators we often see in the charity sector. ✅

This means their data has both credibility and comparability. (2/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
🧵Impact Report Best Practices ⬇️

Just finished reading the latest @dofe.org Impact Report and their Technical Report, and wow, the level of transparency and rigour in their measurement framework is impressive. 📊👏

https://impctlab.uk/DoEImpactReport
https://impctlab.uk/DoETechnicalReport

(1/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
🚨📊 The English #IndicesOfDeprivation2025 will be released in Oct/Nov this year.

This is huge! 🔥

#IMD underpins funding decisions, #research, #policy targeting, and #impact #measurement across England.

If you use #postcode #data, map #disadvantage, or care about place-based work, get ready. 🗺️
theimpactlab.co.uk
Maybe the future of AI isn't just silicon 🤖.

Maybe it's squishier than we thought...

🧠💧

(7/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
Especially if we want AI in the social sector to be part of the solution and not another source of extraction and harm. 🚩

Currently, we don't need to pick between ethics, climate, and innovation but we do need to ask questions about what our tech is doing to people and to the planet 🌍
(6/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
Could these organoids ever develop consciousness? 🧘‍♂️
What are the limits of using human tissue for computing? 🧬
Who owns a piece of lab-grown brain that's doing your data processing? 🧫

But it’s worth sitting with the idea that biological computing might be a path to more sustainable AI.
(5/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
A Swiss company called #FinalSpark is already renting out these brain organoids for around $500/month.💰

They use less energy and could be a low-carbon future for AI if the tech develops further. 🌿

Of course, there are big ethical questions 🚨
(4/7)
theimpactlab.co.uk
Because weirdly, there’s a growing field exploring the use of brain organoids as a form of biological computing. 🧬

Yes, you read that right: miniature brain-like clusters of human cells (nicknamed “wetware”) that can be used as a processor for things like AI.

This isn’t sci-fi 👽 (3/7)