Author | Lightnews

Alexandria Avona

@weresolvingsociety.bsky.social

2 followers 2 following 67 posts

https://tinyurl.com/ywduzxvu Donations: email [email protected] I am currently investigating Terence Tao by myself while being chokeholded like Wikileaks was by Paypal. Musk has also targetted me repeatedly. I don't hack. Democratic design. AMA.

tinyurl.com

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Pinned

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 2d

As human beings that suffocate when intelligence is too low, where intelligence is meaningful, responsive, + comprehension increasing communication, we have a right to timely and intelligible reply, even if it's "I'll get back to you later". The rest is literally slowing down beyond what's workable.

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

As you know, a dense, meaningful and intelligent communications network is the way to intelligence. A less intelligent* mind has more elitism to its central points, and less respect for and connections with its origins, even if it still centers its nervous system. (6/24*)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

We'll see if he replies. So far Terence Tao is just a complete fraud when it comes to accessible, responsive communication with the public. He's going on about how he would have had the school wage substantive reply about the Palestine protests but there is no evidence he can or would do this.

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

Low Return So Bad It Can Only Be Sustained in a Needs Based Economy (Communism) | Talentcel and Narcissism Research (24/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I forsee this loss of money worsening especially as the burden falls more unsustainably on people like me to the point we are incentivized to exit society entirely. (23/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

Like I said I just wrote an essay in the cold rain due to this gross incompetence myself. But while you don't have a way to wage substantive, responsive and timely reply, (22/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

While you are not congruent to that, even if your design is more conducive to your infamous purified result, you will see this flack. It's not fair to me, it's not fair to you.(21/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

dissemination burden across several small sovereignities doing what they can and lots of responsive, high quality communication. (20/24 extra credit)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

Until you resolve these design features, I forsee this getting worse not better for you especially under the populist Trump administration with largely German consensus based backing which requires, unfortunately, distribution of intelligence (20/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

That is very similar to the labor trafficking design. You should know the pain of that having just lost your grant. (19/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I would like to know what you have to say about that as well in your use of AI that doesn't seem to see some of AI is in fact illegal crowdsourced. It is not a crowdsourced/AI dichotomy. (18/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

They are not apples and oranges. This is real violation of consent, it is not a natural resource. It includes real violation of real agency. (17/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

In addition, the violation of consent in Gemini and Rufus where you can't exit out and prevent the extraction shows that much AI is illegally crowdsourced. (16/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

Early Wikileaks is a good example of this, which was why it was targetted for chokeholding by your friend Musk's Paypal. I was wondering what you had to say about that. (15/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I see large Bezos funded organizations generating clearly inferior results with millions times the funds. There is nothing about being grassroots that implies things are less effective or powerful economically. (14/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

Unless you remedy the design to contact you, I foresee you continuing to have this problem, with it even worsening. I also have substantive reply to wage about your issues about grassroots organization just being about emotional content. (13/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I recently posted in the cold and rain about just this effect. I want you to be funded, but this looks like the core root of your issue. (12/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I can and have some freedom in my expression. But while people like you do not rapidly respond and distribute their intelligence to the temporal degrees they can afford, it falls disproportionately on people like me. (11/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I know you are very busy and your excellent, truly genius, work requires painstaking refinement and that you yourself can't afford to not refine in this fashion. (10/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

I want you to be funded. But you're not going to be at least in the case of the grant if you don't fix this issue. You have to be in responsive contact with the democracy that funds you. (9/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

It goes against everything I have learned on intelligence research that wants to increase, not decrease and obstruct, high quality, meaningful, and diverse communication. (8/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

It doesn't do so equally.

I want to know why you are complaining you weren't able to wage substantive reply but then you have structures that purposefully occlude and make this difficult. (7/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

This definition makes it possible to even include the "ping", which is essentially a consent to communicate move, as if such an act were not already embarrassing and absurd to begin with from a free communications perspective. (5/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

In your content about losing your grant, you say that you were not even able as a school to wage substantive reply. Yet all of your social media is wrapped up in elitist and protectionist structures that rationalize the blacklist and discriminatory features like "unconsented contact". (4/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

that makes you apply for account, insinuating that it is supportive and conducive to the blacklist. The blacklist is an illegal, corrupt and outdated structure. It serves protectionism and elitism first and foremost. No healthy, merited public discussion needs either of these. (3/24)

Alexandria Avona @weresolvingsociety.bsky.social · 1d

There are several notable barriers to contacting or replying to you. I especially wanted to comment on your Mathstadon AI content, but I do not want to incentivize the Mastadon design (2/24)