🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
@abcan.bsky.social
Grandma on social media for the very first time.
No DM’s please and thank you.
No DM’s please and thank you.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
🎉 Please welcome MONTREAL to the growing national movement of Healthcare Infusions — volunteer-run, grassroots community web sites helping to recruit healthcare workers!
The Montreal chapter is run by a local speech and language pathologist!
Montreal.healthcareinfusion.org
The Montreal chapter is run by a local speech and language pathologist!
Montreal.healthcareinfusion.org
November 30, 2025 at 7:58 PM
🎉 Please welcome MONTREAL to the growing national movement of Healthcare Infusions — volunteer-run, grassroots community web sites helping to recruit healthcare workers!
The Montreal chapter is run by a local speech and language pathologist!
Montreal.healthcareinfusion.org
The Montreal chapter is run by a local speech and language pathologist!
Montreal.healthcareinfusion.org
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv... Tom Nichols. Perfect. Grade Schoolers in charge of the MAGA Regime.
A Confederacy of Toddlers
The Trump administration is a regime of troubled children.
www.theatlantic.com
November 30, 2025 at 7:19 PM
www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv... Tom Nichols. Perfect. Grade Schoolers in charge of the MAGA Regime.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Exactly!
November 30, 2025 at 6:13 PM
Exactly!
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
MSM - "find me someone who opposes what most experts are saying and what 95% of the people want. We need controversy!"
November 30, 2025 at 1:13 PM
MSM - "find me someone who opposes what most experts are saying and what 95% of the people want. We need controversy!"
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
IMO, CBC is all about the "but" these days. Seems good news is no news. Unless there are naysayers, there's no story! Click-bait rules!!
November 30, 2025 at 3:05 PM
IMO, CBC is all about the "but" these days. Seems good news is no news. Unless there are naysayers, there's no story! Click-bait rules!!
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Yes there will be more ports.
November 30, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Yes there will be more ports.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Who says that will be the only port?
There will be more. Churchill for example.
There will be more. Churchill for example.
November 30, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Who says that will be the only port?
There will be more. Churchill for example.
There will be more. Churchill for example.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Exactly!
November 30, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Exactly!
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Port of Quebec expansion years ago because of the environmental impact.
So PM Carney had a choice.
This project that has backers and a plan or talk someone into restarting the Port of Quebec project that he knew has already failed the environmental impact.
IMO he made the right choice.
3/3
So PM Carney had a choice.
This project that has backers and a plan or talk someone into restarting the Port of Quebec project that he knew has already failed the environmental impact.
IMO he made the right choice.
3/3
November 30, 2025 at 10:35 AM
Port of Quebec expansion years ago because of the environmental impact.
So PM Carney had a choice.
This project that has backers and a plan or talk someone into restarting the Port of Quebec project that he knew has already failed the environmental impact.
IMO he made the right choice.
3/3
So PM Carney had a choice.
This project that has backers and a plan or talk someone into restarting the Port of Quebec project that he knew has already failed the environmental impact.
IMO he made the right choice.
3/3
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
story.
CBC talks to people who have concerns about this project.
The local person has concerns about traffic and the local environment. She has no proof about the environmental impact.
Then CBC talks to an "expert" who says the Port of Quebec should have been chosen.
Yet PM Trudeau rejected the
2/3
CBC talks to people who have concerns about this project.
The local person has concerns about traffic and the local environment. She has no proof about the environmental impact.
Then CBC talks to an "expert" who says the Port of Quebec should have been chosen.
Yet PM Trudeau rejected the
2/3
November 30, 2025 at 10:35 AM
story.
CBC talks to people who have concerns about this project.
The local person has concerns about traffic and the local environment. She has no proof about the environmental impact.
Then CBC talks to an "expert" who says the Port of Quebec should have been chosen.
Yet PM Trudeau rejected the
2/3
CBC talks to people who have concerns about this project.
The local person has concerns about traffic and the local environment. She has no proof about the environmental impact.
Then CBC talks to an "expert" who says the Port of Quebec should have been chosen.
Yet PM Trudeau rejected the
2/3
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
It doesn't matter what you do there will always be someone to complain about it, and in Canada the opposition/media will portray them as heroes without even considering the validity of their claims.
That is why Canada has been in a constant state of decline.
About this
1/3
www.cbc.ca/player/play/...
That is why Canada has been in a constant state of decline.
About this
1/3
www.cbc.ca/player/play/...
Why some say Carney chose to expand the wrong port
The Contrecoeur port near Montreal is being fast-tracked for expansion as part of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s major project initiative. But many detractors say there's a better choice further down th...
www.cbc.ca
November 30, 2025 at 10:35 AM
It doesn't matter what you do there will always be someone to complain about it, and in Canada the opposition/media will portray them as heroes without even considering the validity of their claims.
That is why Canada has been in a constant state of decline.
About this
1/3
www.cbc.ca/player/play/...
That is why Canada has been in a constant state of decline.
About this
1/3
www.cbc.ca/player/play/...
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
They could easily have found as many enthusiastic backers of the chosen project but controversy and rage gets those clicks. Now people with zero knowledge will happily post that PM is ignoring Québécois wishes. Because they thrive on half assed grievances.
November 30, 2025 at 12:53 PM
They could easily have found as many enthusiastic backers of the chosen project but controversy and rage gets those clicks. Now people with zero knowledge will happily post that PM is ignoring Québécois wishes. Because they thrive on half assed grievances.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Agreed 💯. It can't happen quick enough.
The sooner we are through this the better off we all will be
The sooner we are through this the better off we all will be
November 30, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Agreed 💯. It can't happen quick enough.
The sooner we are through this the better off we all will be
The sooner we are through this the better off we all will be
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Yes here we are. The here and now dictates what Canada and Canadians must do in the here and now, if we are to survive , if we are to grow, if we are to become masters not only in our own home, but masters of our own destiny. The US Noose is loosening, time to remove it completely
November 30, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Yes here we are. The here and now dictates what Canada and Canadians must do in the here and now, if we are to survive , if we are to grow, if we are to become masters not only in our own home, but masters of our own destiny. The US Noose is loosening, time to remove it completely
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
And by using an established route that already feeds into the Burnaby/Westridge terminal — a port that can handle the traffic without touching the North Coast tanker exclusion zone — we keep it practical, efficient, and far safer than starting from scratch somewhere else.
Just a thought
Just a thought
November 30, 2025 at 4:41 PM
And by using an established route that already feeds into the Burnaby/Westridge terminal — a port that can handle the traffic without touching the North Coast tanker exclusion zone — we keep it practical, efficient, and far safer than starting from scratch somewhere else.
Just a thought
Just a thought
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
It would keep the impact tightly contained, avoid carving up new territory, and respect the communities and ecosystems that have already done more than their share.
November 30, 2025 at 4:41 PM
It would keep the impact tightly contained, avoid carving up new territory, and respect the communities and ecosystems that have already done more than their share.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
What if we built the new line right alongside the existing Trans Mountain corridor — the same right-of-way that already runs from Alberta to Burnaby?
November 30, 2025 at 4:41 PM
What if we built the new line right alongside the existing Trans Mountain corridor — the same right-of-way that already runs from Alberta to Burnaby?
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
We have to stick together on this.
The only way out is through it — we’re far too deep into the storm to turn back now.
It’s like getting home in a snowstorm: slow, careful, steady… but we are getting there.
The only way out is through it — we’re far too deep into the storm to turn back now.
It’s like getting home in a snowstorm: slow, careful, steady… but we are getting there.
November 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
We have to stick together on this.
The only way out is through it — we’re far too deep into the storm to turn back now.
It’s like getting home in a snowstorm: slow, careful, steady… but we are getting there.
The only way out is through it — we’re far too deep into the storm to turn back now.
It’s like getting home in a snowstorm: slow, careful, steady… but we are getting there.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Even with this temporary compromise, the broader climate fight is still moving forward.
The progress elsewhere is helping offset this setback and keeping us on the road to a low-carbon future.
The progress elsewhere is helping offset this setback and keeping us on the road to a low-carbon future.
November 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Even with this temporary compromise, the broader climate fight is still moving forward.
The progress elsewhere is helping offset this setback and keeping us on the road to a low-carbon future.
The progress elsewhere is helping offset this setback and keeping us on the road to a low-carbon future.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
Because if anyone can find that balance between environment and necessity, it’s you.
And to be clear — Canada is making up ground in other areas.
We’re moving fast on clean energy, EVs, carbon pricing, green tech, and international climate partnerships.
And to be clear — Canada is making up ground in other areas.
We’re moving fast on clean energy, EVs, carbon pricing, green tech, and international climate partnerships.
November 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Because if anyone can find that balance between environment and necessity, it’s you.
And to be clear — Canada is making up ground in other areas.
We’re moving fast on clean energy, EVs, carbon pricing, green tech, and international climate partnerships.
And to be clear — Canada is making up ground in other areas.
We’re moving fast on clean energy, EVs, carbon pricing, green tech, and international climate partnerships.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
If we can’t, it pulls the rug out from under the whole plan.
So I’m asking the people of B.C., directly and honestly:
You are the ones on the ground.
Is there a way to open that corridor in a respectful, least-harmful way?
What would be acceptable?
So I’m asking the people of B.C., directly and honestly:
You are the ones on the ground.
Is there a way to open that corridor in a respectful, least-harmful way?
What would be acceptable?
November 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
If we can’t, it pulls the rug out from under the whole plan.
So I’m asking the people of B.C., directly and honestly:
You are the ones on the ground.
Is there a way to open that corridor in a respectful, least-harmful way?
What would be acceptable?
So I’m asking the people of B.C., directly and honestly:
You are the ones on the ground.
Is there a way to open that corridor in a respectful, least-harmful way?
What would be acceptable?
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
I truly hope we can come to an agreement to get the pipeline through, because getting oil to the Pacific is one of the major building blocks for keeping Canada’s long-term plan on track.
I hope it’s done with respect, and with the least possible impact,but either way, we have to find a path forward
I hope it’s done with respect, and with the least possible impact,but either way, we have to find a path forward
November 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
I truly hope we can come to an agreement to get the pipeline through, because getting oil to the Pacific is one of the major building blocks for keeping Canada’s long-term plan on track.
I hope it’s done with respect, and with the least possible impact,but either way, we have to find a path forward
I hope it’s done with respect, and with the least possible impact,but either way, we have to find a path forward
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
It honestly breaks my heart that we have to step back a bit on our climate fight — and yes, that’s happening because of Trump’s pressure on global markets and trade routes.
But here we are.
But here we are.
November 30, 2025 at 3:39 PM
It honestly breaks my heart that we have to step back a bit on our climate fight — and yes, that’s happening because of Trump’s pressure on global markets and trade routes.
But here we are.
But here we are.
Reposted by 🇨🇦AB.CAN🇨🇦
🤣🤣🤣
November 30, 2025 at 5:33 PM
🤣🤣🤣