David Stone
banner
david-stone.bsky.social
David Stone
@david-stone.bsky.social
A proud liberal striving to look on the bright side. Writer of spicy satires about fun couples I'd like to hang with. Big fan of Carbonara, books, & travel.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07PNCGCQJ
Pinned
New Release! Yes, I do, in fact, write spicy romantic comedies (adjacent). They're about couples finding their various humorous ways through the perils of desire and marriage. It's all in good fun):

www.amazon.com/dp/B0DVMD12SH
How genteel.
February 4, 2026 at 3:20 AM
It's an umbrella term, really.
February 4, 2026 at 3:03 AM
It does fit that he's surrounded himself with turds.
February 4, 2026 at 3:02 AM
Okay. You won't top that today.
February 4, 2026 at 2:50 AM
Concur, though it's a shame drawing and quartering isn't an option.
February 4, 2026 at 2:43 AM
That certainly narrows it down. At the time, Barr was suspected of ordering the hit (though there is a chance I'm misremembering).
February 4, 2026 at 2:33 AM
I understand the redacted sender was Justice Roberts.
February 4, 2026 at 2:31 AM
Yes, but it's not just among the very rich. Moving down the economic ladder, on every rung, there's a cohort that lives for debauchery, and their victims are always the same: misguided young people who are impressed by money and living the supposed "high life." It never ends well for them.
February 4, 2026 at 2:28 AM
What would make enormous wealth simply not worth it anymore? The answer to that question needs to be our trajectory.
February 4, 2026 at 2:17 AM
On January sixth, after the November election they're generally sworn in unless the Capitol is under siege.
February 4, 2026 at 1:17 AM
Timing is everything.
February 4, 2026 at 12:58 AM
There is no reason to believe this woman is sane.
February 4, 2026 at 12:50 AM
They are. Non-whites, seniors, and poor people are considered undesirable.
February 4, 2026 at 12:38 AM
There's the question of succession and whether Johnson would slip into the White House.
February 4, 2026 at 12:37 AM
We've decided that many of the redactions are of Justice Roberts, unless he can prove otherwise.
February 4, 2026 at 12:26 AM
I understand it is possible, but don't know if this would put Johnson in the White House.
February 4, 2026 at 12:24 AM
Let's randomly claim, and with great assurance, that some redacted portions were of Justice Roberts, unless he can prove otherwise.
February 4, 2026 at 12:23 AM
"President Vance" is a frightening prospect.
February 4, 2026 at 12:17 AM
Whoops.
February 3, 2026 at 11:44 PM
Yeah, women are going to love that.

Not.
February 3, 2026 at 11:40 PM
So, a push-back against Trump. I suppose that's a good sign.
February 3, 2026 at 10:16 PM
I trust at least one of these intrepid reporters mentioned this to her ( can’t listen to )
February 3, 2026 at 6:45 PM
George, aside from posting this, what's your take? Free sub if you reply.
February 3, 2026 at 6:02 PM
That's such a depressing map, but let's keep in mind that Obama won two terms, so...
February 3, 2026 at 5:50 PM
I would offer a year of free subs to any reporter who finally mocked Trump to his face. What they'd lose in access would be more than made up for with the praise and respect they'd receive. Plus, the free subs.
February 3, 2026 at 5:40 PM