Jay Stewart
@eithernet.bsky.social
Network Engineer at Energy Sciences Network (AS293) | thoughts/opinions are my own ||
I really hope all this scientific bloodshed makes the purity of greed shine like a beacon that makes the darkened masses extinguish it with fury. That is my silver line of thinking.
May 9, 2025 at 7:19 PM
I really hope all this scientific bloodshed makes the purity of greed shine like a beacon that makes the darkened masses extinguish it with fury. That is my silver line of thinking.
Give me a music platform that allows me greater control over the recommendation algorithm. I want to swatch out the time my niece hijacked my account to play T. Swift or my nights of meditative music.
I need neither in a recommendation and I'm tired of the machines telling me I do.
I need neither in a recommendation and I'm tired of the machines telling me I do.
March 17, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Give me a music platform that allows me greater control over the recommendation algorithm. I want to swatch out the time my niece hijacked my account to play T. Swift or my nights of meditative music.
I need neither in a recommendation and I'm tired of the machines telling me I do.
I need neither in a recommendation and I'm tired of the machines telling me I do.
Reposted by Jay Stewart
"did you make that logo signifying Europe's grim duty to rearm in the face of a hostile United States and expanding Russia?"
"Sure did boss, made it real goatse just like you asked,"
"Sure did boss, made it real goatse just like you asked,"
March 6, 2025 at 8:06 PM
"did you make that logo signifying Europe's grim duty to rearm in the face of a hostile United States and expanding Russia?"
"Sure did boss, made it real goatse just like you asked,"
"Sure did boss, made it real goatse just like you asked,"
Reposted by Jay Stewart
@ehorley.bsky.social @jjx.bsky.social Listened to PP046. on the topic of RFPs and getting IPv6 support in enterprise gear: Apparently one of the few phrases that can actually get through is "must work in the *absence of IPv4*" because "works on IPv6" isn't specific enough.
February 1, 2025 at 3:09 AM
@ehorley.bsky.social @jjx.bsky.social Listened to PP046. on the topic of RFPs and getting IPv6 support in enterprise gear: Apparently one of the few phrases that can actually get through is "must work in the *absence of IPv4*" because "works on IPv6" isn't specific enough.