Robert L. Tsai
@robertltsai.bsky.social
15K followers 600 following 2.5K posts

DEMAND THE IMPOSSIBLE: ONE LAWYER’S PURSUIT OF EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL (2024) amzn.to/45LFzNg & other books | Professor & Harry Elwood Warren Scholar, Boston U. | constitutional law & politics, legal history, democracy | https://linktr.ee/roberttsai .. more

Political science 53%
Law 24%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
robertltsai.bsky.social
Just a photo of me with my 2024 spring child
laprofmme.bsky.social
Courtesy of colleagues at Penn
A variation on Benjamin Franklin’s 1754 engraving in the Pennsylvania Gazette, published in Philadelphia, in an effort to foster cooperation among the various colonies against the tyrant king of Britain, with the American colonies replaced by the nine universities selected for special collaboration opportunities

robertltsai.bsky.social
That little voice to every academic:

robertltsai.bsky.social
“Pedagogical” is interesting; I prefer “deliberative” because it decenters the prominence of judges, who after all are elites. It’s also more than just what judges think law can do, but about leaving space for citizens to figure out what to do to preserve democracy—if they indeed wish to do so.
samklug.bsky.social
This whole piece is very astute. To me the key point is that judges' role should be *pedagogical* much more than political. Juristocracy is bad; explaining how law works in a democracy to non-lawyers is good.
robertltsai.bsky.social
Judges can’t save democracy. So what are they good for? bit.ly/46CzS73

Reposted by Robert L. Tsai

samklug.bsky.social
This whole piece is very astute. To me the key point is that judges' role should be *pedagogical* much more than political. Juristocracy is bad; explaining how law works in a democracy to non-lawyers is good.
robertltsai.bsky.social
Judges can’t save democracy. So what are they good for? bit.ly/46CzS73

robertltsai.bsky.social
“Time is a precious resource in a democracy: It affords the opportunity for reflection, the chance to recognize danger and react appropriately by building bridges and defenses. Judges can buy time in a multiplicity of ways” bit.ly/46CzS73
Can Judicial Resistance Last?
The law can protect democracy—but only up to a certain point. After that, it’s up to the people. And there’s the challenge.
bit.ly

robertltsai.bsky.social
Judges can’t save democracy. So what are they good for? bit.ly/46CzS73

robertltsai.bsky.social
MIT Engineers’ Drinking Song: “we don't give a damn for any old man who don't give a damn for us!”
M.I.T. Rejects a White House Offer for Special Funding Treatment
www.nytimes.com

robertltsai.bsky.social
“if the public can't believe what law enforcement is saying then law enforcement probably can't depend on the cooperation of citizens to report information to them accurately”
lsolum.bsky.social
Please help me get the word out about the new websites for Legal Theory Blog and the Legal Theory Lexicon. Reposting here and on other social media sites is great. It would be especially helpful if law school faculty members could send an email to their colleagues with the new addresses.
Legal Theory Blog
Discover our latest articles and updates. Stay informed with recent posts that cover a variety of topics you care about!
legaltheoryblog.com

robertltsai.bsky.social
“A macabre joke circulated among staffers: certain elderly justices had gotten fed up with being awakened in the middle of the night by prisoners trying to halt their execution.”

robertltsai.bsky.social
“In 1989, [Justice] Powell's committee produced a set of recommendations [to restrict habeas corpus], which Senator Strom Thurmond introduced as legislation … Aides on Capitol Hill had a nickname for the project: ‘Fry Them Faster.’” amzn.to/45LFzNg
Demand the Impossible: One Lawyer's Pursuit of Equal Justice for All
amzn.to

robertltsai.bsky.social
don’t you just love anonymous cop pouts

robertltsai.bsky.social
Deep in the Fairy Pools of Scotland

robertltsai.bsky.social
Once you accept that the Supreme Court behaves as a constitutional policymaking body, you won’t be surprised that originalism is used situationally and strategically—just like every other interpretive approach.

robertltsai.bsky.social
What is the point of the Trump compact? @fishkin.bsky.social: “It is about control. Specifically it is about turning existing federal law, over which the administration has limited control, into terms of a ‘deal’ that offers the government much more control.”
fishkin.bsky.social
I thought I'd put the administration's proposed "compact" with universities in context, so I wrote the blog post below.

It's especially for journalists covering this story!

Many details about how the compact itself works and why the administration has retreated to this strategy.
Balkinization: The Art of Replacing the Law with the Deal
A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics
balkin.blogspot.com

robertltsai.bsky.social
Your point about managerial governance is right but I’d say that both parties believe in elite control—just over different things. I’m with @samuelmoyn.bsky.social that gerontocracy ails the Dem party more than the GOP. There’s some talent but they can’t gain influence fast enough.

robertltsai.bsky.social
The Dems are not (yet) a true opposition party

robertltsai.bsky.social
Importantly, the judge in Portland found that the president’s assertion that federal officers could not enforce federal law without the help of the National Guard was “simply untethered to the facts.” storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com

fishkin.bsky.social
I thought I'd put the administration's proposed "compact" with universities in context, so I wrote the blog post below.

It's especially for journalists covering this story!

Many details about how the compact itself works and why the administration has retreated to this strategy.
Balkinization: The Art of Replacing the Law with the Deal
A group blog on constitutional law, theory, and politics
balkin.blogspot.com

robertltsai.bsky.social
We identify a few areas where the risks of litigation (win or lose) might push the pro-democracy conversation in a positive direction. But we think that flooding the zone with lawsuits, which happened during Trump’s first term, is unlikely to be productive.

robertltsai.bsky.social
On balance, we think pessimists have the better argument, but we present a middle ground by identifying two things that judges can—if the stars align—do to help democracy. But: risky because historically litigation has produced a lot of terrible decisions and reinforced anti-democratic practices.

robertltsai.bsky.social
We point out that commentators can be classified as “judicial optimists” or “judicial pessimists,” each position with great insight but also some flaws.

robertltsai.bsky.social
“The more important question, and one to which we do not yet know the answer, is how Trump’s disputes with judges will play out in the Supreme Court or where it matters the most—with the electorate as a whole.”