Alex V
@alexvagus.bsky.social
**The greatest threats to freedom wear the crown of dictatorship. The downfall of society begins with a tyrant. Yet, throughout history, they fall prey to justice**
I oppose dictators. If you side with them, don’t expect me to stand by you.
I oppose dictators. If you side with them, don’t expect me to stand by you.
😂 All is forgiven. Starfleet records have been corrected. The Federation thanks you for your cooperation.
December 7, 2025 at 12:25 AM
😂 All is forgiven. Starfleet records have been corrected. The Federation thanks you for your cooperation.
First of all, “the one with Voyager” is The Motion Picture, and it had V’Ger, not Voyager. Second, putting V anywhere but last is a crime under Federation law.
December 7, 2025 at 12:16 AM
First of all, “the one with Voyager” is The Motion Picture, and it had V’Ger, not Voyager. Second, putting V anywhere but last is a crime under Federation law.
That’s the most accurate job disqualification he’s ever given
December 7, 2025 at 12:11 AM
That’s the most accurate job disqualification he’s ever given
Hate to be the spoiler here, but it won't be double... it will be, how does astronomical sounds to you?
December 6, 2025 at 10:27 PM
Hate to be the spoiler here, but it won't be double... it will be, how does astronomical sounds to you?
if I use grandma’s diplomacy which has the advantage of speed, clarity, and zero bullshit.... She would simply say... "That Fucking Traitor......" I would spare you the rest.
December 6, 2025 at 8:50 PM
if I use grandma’s diplomacy which has the advantage of speed, clarity, and zero bullshit.... She would simply say... "That Fucking Traitor......" I would spare you the rest.
When a president personally blocks weapons that would protect civilians and stop an aggressor, that is not neutrality or diplomacy, that’s choosing the aggressor’s interest over the victim’s survival. History tends to use very specific words for that kind of choice.
December 6, 2025 at 8:42 PM
When a president personally blocks weapons that would protect civilians and stop an aggressor, that is not neutrality or diplomacy, that’s choosing the aggressor’s interest over the victim’s survival. History tends to use very specific words for that kind of choice.
This behavior shrinks Putin’s strategic exit space and compresses regime failure timelines by removing diplomatic safety valves.
December 6, 2025 at 7:53 PM
This behavior shrinks Putin’s strategic exit space and compresses regime failure timelines by removing diplomatic safety valves.
is a deliberate rejection of diplomacy through kinetic signaling. It demonstrates that Moscow treats negotiations as cover for escalation, not a pathway to de-escalation. This sharply reduces the probability of any negotiated off-ramp and increases long-run regime overextension risk.
December 6, 2025 at 7:53 PM
is a deliberate rejection of diplomacy through kinetic signaling. It demonstrates that Moscow treats negotiations as cover for escalation, not a pathway to de-escalation. This sharply reduces the probability of any negotiated off-ramp and increases long-run regime overextension risk.
The irony is structural. The only party in modern history that has actually changed court composition through power plays was the one that. Blocked a nomination for nearly a year, then rushed confirmations at record speed under unified control
So the warning is projection, not precedent.
So the warning is projection, not precedent.
December 6, 2025 at 6:36 PM
The irony is structural. The only party in modern history that has actually changed court composition through power plays was the one that. Blocked a nomination for nearly a year, then rushed confirmations at record speed under unified control
So the warning is projection, not precedent.
So the warning is projection, not precedent.
When the Kremlin agrees with you, you’re on the wrong side of the mirror. Nothing clarifies a bad take faster than Kremlin approval. Medvedev saying “Exactly” is the reddest flag imaginable.
December 6, 2025 at 4:07 PM
When the Kremlin agrees with you, you’re on the wrong side of the mirror. Nothing clarifies a bad take faster than Kremlin approval. Medvedev saying “Exactly” is the reddest flag imaginable.
God as campaign manager is a new low, even for televangelists
December 5, 2025 at 10:46 PM
God as campaign manager is a new low, even for televangelists
First survive Sweden. Then survive another playoff. Same story as always for Ukraine: nothing given, everything earned.
Ukraine is my realistic favorite , given Sweden’s decline. I give Ukraine the edge. ~70%
Then they would likely face Poland, still Ukraine has a slight edge ~59%
Ukraine is my realistic favorite , given Sweden’s decline. I give Ukraine the edge. ~70%
Then they would likely face Poland, still Ukraine has a slight edge ~59%
December 5, 2025 at 7:37 PM
First survive Sweden. Then survive another playoff. Same story as always for Ukraine: nothing given, everything earned.
Ukraine is my realistic favorite , given Sweden’s decline. I give Ukraine the edge. ~70%
Then they would likely face Poland, still Ukraine has a slight edge ~59%
Ukraine is my realistic favorite , given Sweden’s decline. I give Ukraine the edge. ~70%
Then they would likely face Poland, still Ukraine has a slight edge ~59%
Under Putin you don’t get a lottery. You get a notice, a bus, and a body bag or a prison cell if you refuse
December 5, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Under Putin you don’t get a lottery. You get a notice, a bus, and a body bag or a prison cell if you refuse
translation: any neighbor we can’t dominate is a ‘puppet state.’
That’s how empires talk when they’re shrinking.
That’s how empires talk when they’re shrinking.
December 5, 2025 at 4:38 AM
translation: any neighbor we can’t dominate is a ‘puppet state.’
That’s how empires talk when they’re shrinking.
That’s how empires talk when they’re shrinking.
We’re #55! We’re #55! …Wait, America has ~330 million people and ~6 guys who own all the news. At this point, the U.S. is competing directly with banana republics and losing.
December 5, 2025 at 4:22 AM
We’re #55! We’re #55! …Wait, America has ~330 million people and ~6 guys who own all the news. At this point, the U.S. is competing directly with banana republics and losing.
Nooooooooooooooooooo...................
December 5, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Nooooooooooooooooooo...................
When your only partners are sanctioned states, client regimes, and one overwhelming patron, you’re not balancing power, you’re being slowly absorbed by it
December 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM
When your only partners are sanctioned states, client regimes, and one overwhelming patron, you’re not balancing power, you’re being slowly absorbed by it
Presenting sacred scripture to a dictator in the middle of a slaughter is not spirituality — it’s moral laundering. You don’t cleanse war crimes with ceremony. It’s spiritual garbage used to wallpaper over mass murder
December 5, 2025 at 3:15 AM
Presenting sacred scripture to a dictator in the middle of a slaughter is not spirituality — it’s moral laundering. You don’t cleanse war crimes with ceremony. It’s spiritual garbage used to wallpaper over mass murder
Meeting Modi is what insolvency looks like in diplomatic form. Proof the occupation is already running on borrowed money and borrowed time. If your control of Ukraine requires permanent oil discounts and emergency diplomacy just to stay solvent. Russia is just financing today with tomorrow’s default
December 5, 2025 at 2:47 AM
Meeting Modi is what insolvency looks like in diplomatic form. Proof the occupation is already running on borrowed money and borrowed time. If your control of Ukraine requires permanent oil discounts and emergency diplomacy just to stay solvent. Russia is just financing today with tomorrow’s default
Exhibit A: The posture of a failing state. So who’s actually driving?
December 4, 2025 at 11:55 PM
Exhibit A: The posture of a failing state. So who’s actually driving?
I don’t speculate on secret motives. I look at documented actions. Deportations, mass graves, erasure of cities, forced Russification, whatever they call it, the pattern already meets the legal definition of genocidal conduct. Behavior establishes intent.
December 4, 2025 at 4:34 AM
I don’t speculate on secret motives. I look at documented actions. Deportations, mass graves, erasure of cities, forced Russification, whatever they call it, the pattern already meets the legal definition of genocidal conduct. Behavior establishes intent.
Even if some Ukrainians once leaned pro-Russian, the full-scale invasion wiped that out. After mass killings, deportations, and the destruction of cities. Russian legitimacy in Ukraine is not near zero, it’s negative. This is now total societal rejection, not a political divide.
December 4, 2025 at 4:09 AM
Even if some Ukrainians once leaned pro-Russian, the full-scale invasion wiped that out. After mass killings, deportations, and the destruction of cities. Russian legitimacy in Ukraine is not near zero, it’s negative. This is now total societal rejection, not a political divide.
Russia’s occupation problem is not just politically unwinnable — it’s mathematically non-convergent. The force, money, and legitimacy required to control Ukraine grow faster than Russia’s ability to generate them. That makes long-term success structurally impossible.
December 4, 2025 at 4:01 AM
Russia’s occupation problem is not just politically unwinnable — it’s mathematically non-convergent. The force, money, and legitimacy required to control Ukraine grow faster than Russia’s ability to generate them. That makes long-term success structurally impossible.
This confirms the war was launched on a massive intelligence failure. Russia bet on imagined internal support that never existed, locking the regime into coercion, terror, and an unwinnable occupation.
December 4, 2025 at 4:01 AM
This confirms the war was launched on a massive intelligence failure. Russia bet on imagined internal support that never existed, locking the regime into coercion, terror, and an unwinnable occupation.
He is in power-saving mode. Or maybe he’s buffering.
December 4, 2025 at 2:58 AM
He is in power-saving mode. Or maybe he’s buffering.