𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒟𝑜𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓇 𝒩𝑜.𝟣𝟢
banner
allonsyletsgo.bsky.social
𝒯𝒽𝑒 𝒟𝑜𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓇 𝒩𝑜.𝟣𝟢
@allonsyletsgo.bsky.social
The laws of time are mine, and they will obey me!
Only Companion @dinnerladyrose.bsky.social “You're 70% water and can still drown."

#DoctorWhoRp
#MVRP
WT #MADMAN
// To What ///
March 17, 2025 at 7:26 AM
HAHA - Motherfucker, you can’t even do your own arguments. Sit down, shut up.’*

**Me: Well, if only he read more than his own tantrums, eh? 😂**

#NoGrokForMe #ModernSocialPhilosophy #MuppetsEverywhere #ShutItDown #AllonsY
March 17, 2025 at 5:32 AM
In the meantime, I’ve got better things to do than feed a troll. Enjoy your hollow little ‘win’ while the rest of us get on with our day. **Allons-y.**
#MADMAN
March 17, 2025 at 5:26 AM
You know, here’s a thought—why don’t you have the last word? Go on, throw out that final, desperate tantrum, convince yourself you’ve somehow won. I’ll be over here, moving on, actually having a conversation, not stuck in a pointless, ego-driven pissing match. But hey, knock yourself out.
March 17, 2025 at 5:26 AM
tantrums because you’ve got absolutely nothing left but accusations and insults. How’s that working for you?
March 17, 2025 at 5:26 AM
And look, let’s say *for the sake of fun* that an AI wrote all this. How bloody hilarious would that be? You got outsmarted by a chatbot. That’s gotta sting, doesn't it? Here you are, throwing
March 17, 2025 at 5:26 AM
you, this is *tragic.* I mean, really, you must be sweating bullets now, trying to figure out how to stay on top of a losing argument.
March 17, 2025 at 5:26 AM
And with that, my dear Muppet, I bid you farewell. Hope you enjoyed this little chat, because from here on out, I’m afraid there’s nothing left to discuss. The war’s over, and you lost.

**Allons-y!**
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
So, in the spirit of wrapping things up: you came in here thinking you had an unshakable position, and instead, you’ve spent the entire time flailing about in a logic puddle of your own making. This isn’t a debate anymore—it’s an autopsy of an argument that was never alive to begin with.
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
an argument. You don’t like AI art? *Fantastic!* No one is forcing you to use it. But attempting to dress up subjective dislike as an objective truth is, quite frankly, embarrassing.
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
And then, of course, we arrive at your grand finale: *"AI art looks trash anyway."* Oh, *brilliant!* We’ve now entered the "I don’t like it, so it must be bad" phase of the debate. The absolute peak of intellectual rigor, I must say. Listen, personal taste is not
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
and context that matter. Blanket statements like this don’t make you sound informed; they make you sound like you’ve never actually examined a problem beyond its most superficial talking points.
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
3. **"Using AI enables both of those things."**
Yes, and driving a car enables pollution. Eating fast food enables deforestation. Breathing enables carbon dioxide emissions. *Everything* enables something, but it’s the scale
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
visited. If your argument is that AI should be banned purely because it uses energy, then I’m afraid you’ll need to toss out your phone, computer, and—oh yes—stop using the internet entirely. What’s that? Not quite so eager now? Thought so.
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
You typed this little rant on a device that, fun fact, also consumed energy to manufacture, ship, and power. And let’s not even start on the servers running every website you’ve ever
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
**"AI art damages the environment."**
Ah yes, let’s talk about that, shall we? You do realize that literally *all* digital technology has an environmental impact, yeah?
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
nuanced discussion, not a bloke flailing his arms about, screaming "thief!" like he’s just spotted Artful Dodger nicking a loaf of bread.
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
girls. AI doesn’t "steal" any more than a human artist does when they study reference material. The real question is about fair use and ethical data sourcing—complex issues that need
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
feelings and Twitter outrage. If it did, well, we’d have far bigger problems than AI-generated pictures of anime
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Now, let’s untangle this mess of statements you’ve cobbled together.

1. **"AI art is theft."**
Right. And yet, legally, it isn’t. Now, I know you *want* it to be, but that’s not quite how reality works, is it? Copyright law doesn’t function on gut
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM
me" is not, and has never been, a valid argument. That’s just social validation dressed up as fact, and quite frankly, it’s about as convincing as a Dalek at a peace rally.
March 17, 2025 at 5:15 AM