Andrés Salgado - Ragan
@andressalgadoragan.bsky.social
- Political Philosophy
- The Aristotelian Society
- The Quintessence
composed by Thijs Lodewijk
- The Aristotelian Society
- The Quintessence
composed by Thijs Lodewijk
------>
“We all have a desire, longing for love, connection, closeness, security with another,”
“We all have a desire, longing for love, connection, closeness, security with another,”
December 1, 2025 at 9:08 PM
------>
“We all have a desire, longing for love, connection, closeness, security with another,”
“We all have a desire, longing for love, connection, closeness, security with another,”
from R. Zaretsky’s book review
“ Schopenhauer drew a simple maxim: “Do no harm; and help others to the extent you can. ”
“ Schopenhauer drew a simple maxim: “Do no harm; and help others to the extent you can. ”
December 1, 2025 at 4:14 PM
from R. Zaretsky’s book review
“ Schopenhauer drew a simple maxim: “Do no harm; and help others to the extent you can. ”
“ Schopenhauer drew a simple maxim: “Do no harm; and help others to the extent you can. ”
well done, onward and upwards
November 30, 2025 at 6:37 PM
well done, onward and upwards
“ The further political integration of at least the core of the European Union has never been as vital to our survival as it is today. And never so improbable.”
November 30, 2025 at 4:10 PM
“ The further political integration of at least the core of the European Union has never been as vital to our survival as it is today. And never so improbable.”
interesting essay
However, Schopenhauer accused Hegel of distorting politics, religion, and morality to justify the dominance of Prussia
He saw Hegel’s utopian philosophy of right as servant of political power rather than a critique of the nationalism in the 1820s
However, Schopenhauer accused Hegel of distorting politics, religion, and morality to justify the dominance of Prussia
He saw Hegel’s utopian philosophy of right as servant of political power rather than a critique of the nationalism in the 1820s
November 30, 2025 at 1:12 PM
interesting essay
However, Schopenhauer accused Hegel of distorting politics, religion, and morality to justify the dominance of Prussia
He saw Hegel’s utopian philosophy of right as servant of political power rather than a critique of the nationalism in the 1820s
However, Schopenhauer accused Hegel of distorting politics, religion, and morality to justify the dominance of Prussia
He saw Hegel’s utopian philosophy of right as servant of political power rather than a critique of the nationalism in the 1820s
thats a bit odd, my feed says Marylin Delgado posted it
?!?
?!?
November 29, 2025 at 6:27 PM
thats a bit odd, my feed says Marylin Delgado posted it
?!?
?!?
yes however, it is really more about reading and thinking critically in parallel
thinking critically defined as critique
thinking critically defined as critique
November 29, 2025 at 6:16 PM
yes however, it is really more about reading and thinking critically in parallel
thinking critically defined as critique
thinking critically defined as critique
probably so
Though his critique of Hegel’s idealism is far more interesting
Though his critique of Hegel’s idealism is far more interesting
November 29, 2025 at 1:32 PM
probably so
Though his critique of Hegel’s idealism is far more interesting
Though his critique of Hegel’s idealism is far more interesting
not sure that Spinoza would agree with Althusser’s theories on Marxist anti humanism
November 29, 2025 at 9:20 AM
not sure that Spinoza would agree with Althusser’s theories on Marxist anti humanism
I can imagine that S had a low opinion of the Young Hegelians too
November 28, 2025 at 6:32 PM
I can imagine that S had a low opinion of the Young Hegelians too
The “drastically undialectical version of history” mentioned by T. Eagleton in this book seems out of place
Schopenhauer had no time for Marx’s dialectic view of history mainly because Marx admired Hegel
Schopenhauer had no time for Marx’s dialectic view of history mainly because Marx admired Hegel
November 28, 2025 at 2:40 PM
The “drastically undialectical version of history” mentioned by T. Eagleton in this book seems out of place
Schopenhauer had no time for Marx’s dialectic view of history mainly because Marx admired Hegel
Schopenhauer had no time for Marx’s dialectic view of history mainly because Marx admired Hegel
* on the feed
November 28, 2025 at 12:55 PM
* on the feed
ah!
sorry, I saw another name on feed
sorry, I saw another name on feed
November 28, 2025 at 11:54 AM
ah!
sorry, I saw another name on feed
sorry, I saw another name on feed
and a very timely book review in this age of AI
perhaps forward the review to David Chalmers at NYU
perhaps forward the review to David Chalmers at NYU
November 27, 2025 at 5:21 PM
and a very timely book review in this age of AI
perhaps forward the review to David Chalmers at NYU
perhaps forward the review to David Chalmers at NYU
and a very timely article
perhaps forward it to David Bather woods, his book on Schopenhauer was reviewed in the LRB this week
perhaps forward it to David Bather woods, his book on Schopenhauer was reviewed in the LRB this week
November 27, 2025 at 5:13 PM
and a very timely article
perhaps forward it to David Bather woods, his book on Schopenhauer was reviewed in the LRB this week
perhaps forward it to David Bather woods, his book on Schopenhauer was reviewed in the LRB this week
so that’s probably why he decided to call his dog “Atman”
November 27, 2025 at 12:18 PM
so that’s probably why he decided to call his dog “Atman”
as a nod,,,
November 27, 2025 at 6:59 AM
as a nod,,,
and let's not forget that Schopenhauer named his dog Atman as not to the Buddhist texts he had in his library
November 26, 2025 at 9:18 PM
and let's not forget that Schopenhauer named his dog Atman as not to the Buddhist texts he had in his library