Brian Kemper
@bwkemper.bsky.social
Attorney, father, Peloton addict, writer, and Eternal Keeper of the Final Word
Check out my novel "Everything Can Change" available on Amazon.
Check out my novel "Everything Can Change" available on Amazon.
That’s completely his MO. Say some BS and then stop people from
contradicting him.
What a tool.
contradicting him.
What a tool.
December 1, 2025 at 10:08 PM
That’s completely his MO. Say some BS and then stop people from
contradicting him.
What a tool.
contradicting him.
What a tool.
I am not surprised.
He says that I'm ignoring FCC rules and regulations and he can't even cite them.
He says that I'm ignoring FCC rules and regulations and he can't even cite them.
December 1, 2025 at 5:05 PM
I am not surprised.
He says that I'm ignoring FCC rules and regulations and he can't even cite them.
He says that I'm ignoring FCC rules and regulations and he can't even cite them.
They also don't understand that if the FCC were "revoke" a license or a "satellite uplink" due to their news coverage, the FCC is effectively trying to control content.
December 1, 2025 at 4:24 PM
They also don't understand that if the FCC were "revoke" a license or a "satellite uplink" due to their news coverage, the FCC is effectively trying to control content.
And what this person doesn't realize is that revoking a satellite uplink because of the network's journalistic and "sycophantic coverage" is literally a regulation of content.
December 1, 2025 at 4:15 PM
And what this person doesn't realize is that revoking a satellite uplink because of the network's journalistic and "sycophantic coverage" is literally a regulation of content.
satellite uplink from the network to the broadcast stations is practically useless, in addition to being legally baseless.
Yet, somehow, I'm the "troll" providing useless info.
Yet, somehow, I'm the "troll" providing useless info.
December 1, 2025 at 4:13 PM
satellite uplink from the network to the broadcast stations is practically useless, in addition to being legally baseless.
Yet, somehow, I'm the "troll" providing useless info.
Yet, somehow, I'm the "troll" providing useless info.
They also didn't understand why I brought up streaming in the first place.
I did so to illustrate that "broadcast stations" are virtually obsolete and that streaming is where most are getting the information from these networks.
As a result, their solution to revoke the ...
I did so to illustrate that "broadcast stations" are virtually obsolete and that streaming is where most are getting the information from these networks.
As a result, their solution to revoke the ...
December 1, 2025 at 4:12 PM
They also didn't understand why I brought up streaming in the first place.
I did so to illustrate that "broadcast stations" are virtually obsolete and that streaming is where most are getting the information from these networks.
As a result, their solution to revoke the ...
I did so to illustrate that "broadcast stations" are virtually obsolete and that streaming is where most are getting the information from these networks.
As a result, their solution to revoke the ...
I don't think they have blocked anyone yet.
They just deleted a couple of their posts after a tardy mea culpa.
They just deleted a couple of their posts after a tardy mea culpa.
December 1, 2025 at 4:10 PM
I don't think they have blocked anyone yet.
They just deleted a couple of their posts after a tardy mea culpa.
They just deleted a couple of their posts after a tardy mea culpa.
They deleted about a half hour later after calling people proving them wrong as "random bots."
And then posting an entirely new thread to repeat the assertions and the personal accusations.
And then posting an entirely new thread to repeat the assertions and the personal accusations.
December 1, 2025 at 4:09 PM
They deleted about a half hour later after calling people proving them wrong as "random bots."
And then posting an entirely new thread to repeat the assertions and the personal accusations.
And then posting an entirely new thread to repeat the assertions and the personal accusations.
The legal definition this person said was irrelevant to my points and called me a troll for posting them?
December 1, 2025 at 4:08 PM
The legal definition this person said was irrelevant to my points and called me a troll for posting them?
The posts can be seen by looking at the individual timelines (although this is a hassle).
It's the "nuclear block" method Bluesky uses.
It's the "nuclear block" method Bluesky uses.
December 1, 2025 at 4:06 PM
The posts can be seen by looking at the individual timelines (although this is a hassle).
It's the "nuclear block" method Bluesky uses.
It's the "nuclear block" method Bluesky uses.
It was from me when I explained that their solution of having the FCC revoke NBC's "satellite uplink" could not be done because the FCC had no authority to do so.
The reason you can't see it is because you follow me and because I am blocked from that post, so you are you (at least in this feed) ...
The reason you can't see it is because you follow me and because I am blocked from that post, so you are you (at least in this feed) ...
December 1, 2025 at 4:06 PM
It was from me when I explained that their solution of having the FCC revoke NBC's "satellite uplink" could not be done because the FCC had no authority to do so.
The reason you can't see it is because you follow me and because I am blocked from that post, so you are you (at least in this feed) ...
The reason you can't see it is because you follow me and because I am blocked from that post, so you are you (at least in this feed) ...
It wasn't in the original post. It was in a later post when I said that the FCC authority for the broadcast licencses were not over the satellite transmission but rather the transmission by the station to the viewers.
December 1, 2025 at 4:02 PM
It wasn't in the original post. It was in a later post when I said that the FCC authority for the broadcast licencses were not over the satellite transmission but rather the transmission by the station to the viewers.
And they weren’t referring to cable at all as shown by their post re: the satellite use by broadcast stations.
December 1, 2025 at 3:55 PM
And they weren’t referring to cable at all as shown by their post re: the satellite use by broadcast stations.
And why did you call the people who proved you wrong “random bots?”
December 1, 2025 at 3:53 PM
And why did you call the people who proved you wrong “random bots?”
Why did you post this in the first place when it was shown you had the wrong information the first time that you posted it?
That was done almost a half hour ago.
That was done almost a half hour ago.
December 1, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Why did you post this in the first place when it was shown you had the wrong information the first time that you posted it?
That was done almost a half hour ago.
That was done almost a half hour ago.
during the Trump litigations that Habba represented him in and during the Senate's hearings on Bondi's appointment to Attorney General.
You're doing the exact same things those two do: spread lies that are easily disproven and attacking the messengers.
You're doing the exact same things those two do: spread lies that are easily disproven and attacking the messengers.
December 1, 2025 at 3:50 PM
during the Trump litigations that Habba represented him in and during the Senate's hearings on Bondi's appointment to Attorney General.
You're doing the exact same things those two do: spread lies that are easily disproven and attacking the messengers.
You're doing the exact same things those two do: spread lies that are easily disproven and attacking the messengers.
You're absolutely wrong as the NJ and Florida records show that they are licensed to practice law in their states and thus, that they pass the bar.
And you provide nothing to support your assertions.
Hell, if Habba and Bondi were able to practice the law, that would have been raised ....
And you provide nothing to support your assertions.
Hell, if Habba and Bondi were able to practice the law, that would have been raised ....
December 1, 2025 at 3:48 PM
You're absolutely wrong as the NJ and Florida records show that they are licensed to practice law in their states and thus, that they pass the bar.
And you provide nothing to support your assertions.
Hell, if Habba and Bondi were able to practice the law, that would have been raised ....
And you provide nothing to support your assertions.
Hell, if Habba and Bondi were able to practice the law, that would have been raised ....
I'm just laughing at their use of "RF energy" as what satellites do. They also don't realize that what satellites do doesn't meet the definition of "broadcasting" and "radio communications."
December 1, 2025 at 3:46 PM
I'm just laughing at their use of "RF energy" as what satellites do. They also don't realize that what satellites do doesn't meet the definition of "broadcasting" and "radio communications."
Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
They wouldn't have been able to represent Trump in litigation or become FL AG without passing the bar and being licensed to practice law.
They wouldn't have been able to represent Trump in litigation or become FL AG without passing the bar and being licensed to practice law.
December 1, 2025 at 3:43 PM
Don't believe everything you read on the internet.
They wouldn't have been able to represent Trump in litigation or become FL AG without passing the bar and being licensed to practice law.
They wouldn't have been able to represent Trump in litigation or become FL AG without passing the bar and being licensed to practice law.
How Trumpian of you.
December 1, 2025 at 3:42 PM
How Trumpian of you.
Interesting that you call accounts "random bots" when such accounts list actual names and provide other identifying information when you don't.
I'm betting its because they provide proof that you're wrong and rather than dealing with the proof, you're attacking the messengers.
I'm betting its because they provide proof that you're wrong and rather than dealing with the proof, you're attacking the messengers.
December 1, 2025 at 3:42 PM
Interesting that you call accounts "random bots" when such accounts list actual names and provide other identifying information when you don't.
I'm betting its because they provide proof that you're wrong and rather than dealing with the proof, you're attacking the messengers.
I'm betting its because they provide proof that you're wrong and rather than dealing with the proof, you're attacking the messengers.
How do you think that proves your point?
A lack of a specialist certification means nothing with regard to passing the bar or having a license to practice law in the state.
A lack of a specialist certification means nothing with regard to passing the bar or having a license to practice law in the state.
December 1, 2025 at 3:40 PM
How do you think that proves your point?
A lack of a specialist certification means nothing with regard to passing the bar or having a license to practice law in the state.
A lack of a specialist certification means nothing with regard to passing the bar or having a license to practice law in the state.
Did you see their post that satellites use "RF energy" as support for the FCC actions b/c the FCC regulates "RF transmissions?"
December 1, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Did you see their post that satellites use "RF energy" as support for the FCC actions b/c the FCC regulates "RF transmissions?"
Way to bring up an irrelevant point to obscure the fact that you're spreading BS re: Habba and Bondi.
We don't need BS when the actual truth is just as devastating.
We don't need BS when the actual truth is just as devastating.
December 1, 2025 at 3:35 PM
Way to bring up an irrelevant point to obscure the fact that you're spreading BS re: Habba and Bondi.
We don't need BS when the actual truth is just as devastating.
We don't need BS when the actual truth is just as devastating.
Also, note that my point re: streaming was to demonstrate why your "solution" not only was unlawful, it was impractical.
It wouldn't have addressed the major way that the networks are and will be transmitting content.
It wouldn't have addressed the major way that the networks are and will be transmitting content.
December 1, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Also, note that my point re: streaming was to demonstrate why your "solution" not only was unlawful, it was impractical.
It wouldn't have addressed the major way that the networks are and will be transmitting content.
It wouldn't have addressed the major way that the networks are and will be transmitting content.