Fredrick Brennan (★コピペ) 🦝🔣📗
banner
copypaste.bsky.social
Fredrick Brennan (★コピペ) 🦝🔣📗
@copypaste.bsky.social
“an oddly imposing figure”—theguardian.co.uk 📬 [email protected]
If the U.S. wants to run a genuine tech embargo, it cannot allow even one qualified engineer, technical document, or machine part through.

It may take a few years, but I'm confident the U.S. has already lost.
December 1, 2025 at 2:40 AM
No, it just means yes in Russian.
November 22, 2025 at 1:55 PM
да
November 22, 2025 at 1:34 PM
I hope that there will not be AI in Nirvāṇa.😅
November 22, 2025 at 1:11 PM
The more people you can hire, the more plausible deniability you can create. At the highest level of income, you can create essentially infinite plausible deniability. Even given this, some wealthy men are so debased, that essentially infinite is not enough for them.
November 20, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Talk to it long enough and it's not so hard to get it to respond as if its politics are in the red corner. You've just got to use the right framing device.
November 9, 2025 at 1:04 PM
I think the main problem is that the eyes are too small. Something that makes things cute is having big eyes. I don't know why they went with small beady eyes.
November 1, 2025 at 4:18 PM
I blame FNAF.
October 30, 2025 at 9:55 PM
But they aren't interested in doing anything to help the world like this, just in lining their own pockets. Because under modern capitalism, it's no longer enough to create a fantastically successful piece of robotic hardware. You want to control the software lifespan of that robot forever.
October 30, 2025 at 9:46 PM
You can even imagine a version of this where volunteers help people that are elderly or physically disabled that have one of these and operate the robot for them. And each client of the charity has, let's say, a certain number of uses of the robot per day.
October 30, 2025 at 9:46 PM
The clauses 'a chance of' and 'in the mind of' are doing all of the work.
October 30, 2025 at 9:40 PM
Yeah, I should have written, all that matters is that it has a chance of being profitable, in the mind of an insane billionaire like Elon Musk.
October 30, 2025 at 9:39 PM
That corporation can be a shareholder in a startup, and that gives them just enough plausible deniability to take the profit.
October 30, 2025 at 9:33 PM
I think with the concept of startups, people no longer care if something is tasteful. All that matters is that it's profitable. Because the capital does not need to be associated anymore with a large corporation.
October 30, 2025 at 9:33 PM
"We have to keep developing child-killing death ray technology because if we don't, then China will and China can't be the only one to have that kind of technology."
October 30, 2025 at 9:27 PM
I think that the fact that people in China are also developing AI systems is just an instant thought-stopping cliche in their mind. That means that they have to keep developing these systems no matter what harms they cause. Because, God forbid the Chinese get ahead of us technologically in anything.
October 30, 2025 at 9:26 PM
At least, I have not seen anything stating this, and the vibes feel very much to the contrary. So prove me wrong if you can.
October 30, 2025 at 9:20 PM
For me, I think this is really the biggest red flag. That their employees are allowed to control the robot and see all of what it can do. But you are not allowed to control the robot with the software they have, even if you buy one. That's insane to me.
October 30, 2025 at 9:20 PM