Congratulations to Joy for all of her hard work and to all the visitors to my lab including Daniel, Rodolfo, and Michael, who had an incredible impact and thanks to Maria!

Thanks also to the three reviewers that provided excellent insights to improve the paper.

Using DefenseFinder misses nearly all of the toxin/antitoxin systems; i.e., the most prevalent phage defense system is missing to a large degree from this database. I recommend running TAFinder or TADB. etc., too, to search for TAs, which likely are anti-phage systems.

Using DefenseFinder misses nearly all of the toxin/antitoxin systems; i.e., the most prevalent phage defense system is missing to a large degree from this database. I recommend running TAFinder or TADB. etc., too, to search for TAs, which likely are anti-phage systems.

Congratulations Ilana!

Cryptic Prophage (phage 🧬🪤 in 🦠)
(2/2) Not cited: doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14075 where it was shown the few live VBNCs = persisters. Also, there is no proof of differences in dormancy, i.e., no differences in persister cells (enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...).

🧐Yes, indeed, there is a continuum of dormancy: Persisters revive based on ribosomes almost instantaneously with food and VBNCs never revive since they are dead, which is the ultimate dormant state...i.e., protein aggregation = death.

I am sorry to hear that Vivek. I hope the pain diminishes.