Dan Sohege
banner
danielsohege.bsky.social
Dan Sohege
@danielsohege.bsky.social
Director of human rights consultancy Stand For All. Specialist in international refugee law, human rights policy, comms and advocacy. Also posting about being autistic and LGBTQIA+ rights. (They/them). My views, no-one else would want them.
"This is the end. I feel it. We are doomed. I feel the icy breath of death upon my neck ... Take me to the window. I wish to say goodbye. Goodbye, cruel world"
Or more accurately, she wasn't allowed a double amount of Dreamies
November 30, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Honestly, I have absolutely let it go. I mean, it was just a game. Nope, no hard feelings at all. 😁
November 30, 2025 at 8:11 PM
If that is from the BBC piece then it was the mum of the autistic lad which really creeped me out.
November 30, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Locusts on the lines?
November 29, 2025 at 9:54 PM
I never had any hopes for this shambles, but am genuinely curious how you end up having "factions" this early on when there are only two of you.
Change UK suddenly celebrating not being the most embarrassing political launch in recent years.

observer.co.uk/news/nationa...
November 28, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Btw, BBC, Le Monde et al, all include that interceptions will take place in the channel, so considering we already see deaths with interceptions at the coast are you really planning on carrying on this argument
November 28, 2025 at 6:58 PM
Show me someone who hasn't done the required reading.
www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...
November 28, 2025 at 11:29 AM
November 27, 2025 at 9:03 PM
You can't make me
November 27, 2025 at 8:55 PM
I think we may have a winner for Betteridge's law
November 27, 2025 at 5:50 PM
Ah, Tony. I will hold my hands up to bias here, having debated Tony on more than one occasion and personally considering him a raging moron, but, no, it is not "quite easy to disappear", unless you enter circumstances of exploitation, where you are quite likely to need protection. 2/
November 26, 2025 at 10:05 PM
What Telegraph fails to mention here is, chances are, quite a substantial number of people on these statistics have already left the country and not been recognised as doing so. It's a piss poor attempt at trying to garner anger over a, relatively, non-issue 1/
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11...
November 26, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Honestly, I am only surprised this hasn't happened sooner.

The one in one out scheme is a fundamentally inhumane policy which has already been seen to rely on disregarding even the most basic of safeguarding principles or recognition of people's asylum needs.

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025...
November 26, 2025 at 6:06 PM
If I was implementing changes to immigration and asylum systems guaranteed to increase Home Office costs, as well as financial burdens on individuals, businesses, higher ed etc, decreasing spending in communities and risking increased costs for everyone, I'd simply not boast about it in my budget.
November 26, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Sorry, what now? Personally I tend to think this government suggesting scrapping the right to appeal is potentially an even bigger issue with Lammy's reported proposals than the idiotic idea of getting rid of juries. This would be dangerous territory. #r4today

solicitornews.co.uk/lammy-jury-t...
November 26, 2025 at 6:56 AM
You’ve been kidnapped. The characters from the last TV show you watched are trying to rescue you. Who’s coming to save you?

I am not loving my chances.
November 25, 2025 at 5:14 PM
This is objectively bollocks by Malhotra, so very much in tune with Labour comms on this.
People's circumstances change, global situations change. That is the main reason why you get people on one visa route needing to apply for asylum. It is not "abuse of the system"

www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
November 25, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Labour's anti-asylum policies are already fundamentally inhumane and discriminatory. Applying them retrospectively is pure cruelty though. It serves absolutely no purpose. Meanwhile it will increase the costs and bureaucracy of an already dysfunctional Home Office.
www.thetimes.com/article/6f83...
November 24, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Absolutely not
November 23, 2025 at 7:18 PM
I think about this scene waaay too often while following politics*

*I have still quit drinking however
November 23, 2025 at 7:06 PM
For those wondering, and wanting to read more, including where he compares the Home Secretary to Elizabeth 1st, it is from an interview today in the Telegraph
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/11...
November 23, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Yup.
November 23, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Is that possibly because anyone with half a braincell and a genuine understanding of politics and issues knows GB News is a joke by any chance?
November 23, 2025 at 3:19 PM
Why is transphobia the default state for so many arseholes?
November 23, 2025 at 3:19 PM
What is this word salad?
Tag yourself
November 23, 2025 at 3:19 PM