i drive by this monstrosity several times a week. the first time i saw it my mind broke a little bit and i just started mumbling "labubu cybertruck" to myself for the rest of the drive

I know we can have other interests outside of the awful but also lmao fuck out of here “constitutional law professor” looks like you wasted your fucking life now that there is no more constitution

sucks to suck shoulda followed his dreams and gone to art school

some of us are recreational hoarders

🫳🎹 the lotions out 🎶
🫳🎹 it’s in my hand 🎶

I think you might be confusing the contractual relationship between the university as institution and the student, which is recognized, but a syllabus or rubric absolutely isn't the instrument that makes that relationship contractual. You might find this NIH peer reviewed article enlightening:

Hey I see what you're saying but they absolutely are not contracts. Contracts have to meet some basic criteria including consideration, which no syllabus (much less a rubric) could provide. I would repeat my request for any relevant case law backing up OP's first amendment assertions.

The problem isn't whether the essay merited a 0 or a 65, and acting like you're the adult in the room speaking truth to power because you think that a zero isn't /technically/ the exact score she deserves according to the prompt is missing the point so willfully as to be itself transphobic

I got my BS and MS in American universities and it's incredible to learn that OU has laxer standards than my crappy little university had.

Not digging around an obviously failing and off-topic essay hunting for points to give like a law professor does with final exams is not a first amendment violation.

lol come the fuck on, man

Oh for sure didn't mean to sound like I was disagreeing at all, to be clear. Just really shocked to see any academics trying to defend this.

some might say this was too harsh, but I think we can go further and actually exile him to England