@chris.blue your post is spot on about the technical merits(or lack of) of MCP. Just sharing perspectives of people I have talked to :)

This would be a problem if you used the data in an agentic application for a real estate business.

This is why Table Structure Understanding models are still the most reliable way to parse tables in business critical applications.

It works pretty well! I will create an open source repo, with some code which ingests all these PDFs and creates datasets for people to work :)

Test prompts instantly with our intuitive JSON schema editor and extract complex tables, figures, and charts with ease.

Once your schema is set, run our API at scale—tens of thousands of times per day—ingesting new documents and writing structured data directly into your database or warehouse.

I don’t live in New York but will come out just for that :)

Does Dagster have a way of packaging workflows into artifacts along with dependencies? Looks like in your screenshot you are importing requests. Do you build some docker images out of band and make sure the workflow functions run on those images?

This means we won’t need a dynamodb table anymore right?

Meant creating an artifact which includes the system and python dependencies. I have seen some tools copying code into a container with system dependencies, which others pickling the code and putting it into a container.

I know man. I poured my heart out on nomad back in the day. It was a ton of hard work. Thanks for appreciating :)

This is why you see Anthropic and OpenAI go up the stack and integrating document sources and building agentic frameworks and building a better chat/workspace product.