Currently: Add-ons DevRel at Mozilla, co-chair of the W3C WebExtensions Community Group
Previously: Chrome, video game industry
Then I thought about genericising that further with support for arbitrary (numeric?) values
Then I thought about genericising that further with support for arbitrary (numeric?) values
Is the aim to offer a set of built in commands that operate on the element specified in the commandFor attribute? I'm imaging a basic set of commands like set, clear, and toggle that devs could work with without JS
Is the aim to offer a set of built in commands that operate on the element specified in the commandFor attribute? I'm imaging a basic set of commands like set, clear, and toggle that devs could work with without JS
On first read MDN's description of it as "a way to declaratively assign behaviors to buttons…" scared me 'cause I thought there would be no way to adjust bindings after initialization, but it's all standard element attributes and such. Nice :D
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/W...
On first read MDN's description of it as "a way to declaratively assign behaviors to buttons…" scared me 'cause I thought there would be no way to adjust bindings after initialization, but it's all standard element attributes and such. Nice :D
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/W...
- floating keyboard moving around unusably when positioned too close to the bottom of the screen
- in iPhone compatibility mode, the keyboard gets stuck on press-and-hold keys
- unfinished graphics on the floating keyboard
- floating keyboard moving around unusably when positioned too close to the bottom of the screen
- in iPhone compatibility mode, the keyboard gets stuck on press-and-hold keys
- unfinished graphics on the floating keyboard