Drew M.M.
banner
drewmm.com
Drew M.M.
@drewmm.com
Writer, Audio Guy, Businessboi, Rescue Dog Otaku.
This is kind of an object lesson in how (understandably, I'd argue!) paranoid people are about any little policy or feature change.

I do in fact spend a lot of time disabling unwanted, auto-enabled features and opting out of stuff I definitely never intentionally opted into.
November 25, 2025 at 3:42 PM
(But it is *also* too funny not to do).
November 25, 2025 at 3:40 PM
(I saw first preview in NYC, so maybe they added a line to that effect since then. But honestly probably not!)
November 25, 2025 at 3:23 PM
And look, love me some Stephen Schwartz, lifelong Schwartz-head here, but he's not the guy for the material either.

The best melody in the show is this little motif for the phrase "American royalty," and *nobody* ever says "Wasn't the point of America supposed to be that we don't have royalty?"
November 25, 2025 at 3:23 PM
It seems like a perfect match until you think about it for like a second.
November 25, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Looks like the article is updated and everyone is confused. www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/20...
[Correction] Gmail can read your emails and attachments to power "smart features"
Did you know that Gmail can use your emails and attachments for its smart features? Here's how to check your settings.
www.malwarebytes.com
November 23, 2025 at 12:15 AM
He'd say he was possessed by an eldritch horror at the time, and that'd probably be true, but that wouldn't really make it better.
November 20, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Ooh, this is brand new to me! Picked it up! Thanks!
November 16, 2025 at 11:34 PM
"Voters' frustrations with the status quo are not the same as a desire for socialism," so always leave the door open for barbarism, too.
October 28, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Yeah, I think at its best (like most criticism at its best) it does the Jonathan Gold thing: "The only question is why." Why put those blocks there?

At its worst it disappears into abstractions from first principles and prides itself on being disconnected from games as they're actually experienced.
October 20, 2025 at 8:11 PM
But that's a *textural* difference, and this notion of gameplay-as-a-discrete-thing-fully-seprabale-from-aesthetics tends to work weirdly hard to ignore texture. In order to be mystified by the difference here, we have to pretend that, by default, we experience games purely and entirely as rulesets.
October 20, 2025 at 7:57 PM
The parsimonious reading is that they mean the two things are *functionally* identical: that there's nothing you can *do* with the one as a player that you can't do with the other.

That's still somewhat incorrect, of course: You can move Mario differently while you've already failed for a start.
October 20, 2025 at 7:51 PM
That does seem pretty open-and-shut.
October 17, 2025 at 11:08 PM
But with one woman and eight malfunctioning Roombas.
October 10, 2025 at 2:29 PM