Michiel Duvekot
@duvekot.bsky.social
1.6K followers 1.1K following 180 posts
#kakistographs from Ancient Greek κάκιστος (kákistos, 'worst')
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
If you thought that was bad, I'll give you this beauty from the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' 2024 report on cosmetic surgery trends that the WSJ cites:
Screenshot from https://www.plasticsurgery.org/documents/News/Statistics/2024/plastic-surgery-statistics-report-2024.pdf "Increase in Chest and Cosmetic Procedures reported since 2023". Series of concentric ellipses and one spiral labeled 1% for Breast Reduction, Tummy Tuck, Breast Augmentation, Liposuction and 0% for Breast Lift.
Betteridge’s Law of Headlines
Deontic vs epistemic modalities?
You’re welcome, but wouldn’t you want a better version?
The patterns are easier to see in a small multiple
Small multiple scatterplot of  4 groups along 2 axes "Non" - "Oui" and "Faible" - "Fort" the top red, red group shows a distinct triangular pattern: the lower values one the  "Faible" - "Fort" axis are closer to the middle  on the   "Non" - "Oui" axis.
I read the second largest first. The largest is too big and somehow falls apart. It only works if I zoom out so much that the smallest text becomes illegible.
"De plank misslaan" is een verhaspeling van "de (loop)plank mis zijn" en "de bal misslaan". 🤦
People's motives for doing so become much clearer if you think of talking to an LLM as talking to yourself.
Rephrased as testable hypothesis: Charts that maximize social proximity between maker and viewer while minimizing aesthetic intimidation will outperform technically superior charts in engagement metrics, provided they affirm the viewer's biases and offer an insight that is retrospectively obvious.
My aesthetic theory of crap: The viewer perceives a shitty chart as something they could have made, but didn't, and the reasserts their competence by sharing it. If a chart is really good, they can't do that. Those get shared only by people who –think– they're as competent as the creator.
Hagan Blix, in Why we fear AI has been making a similar argument.
Reposted by Michiel Duvekot
civictechto.bsky.social
Civic Spark is built by us — the civic tech community.

Join us Aug 16–17 for a volunteer-led gathering shaping the future of public life.

Full story → civictech.ca/announcements/civic-spark
Tickets → civic-spark.com
That's a bit like asking if yellow is red or green.
What it means? That's easy: You know have permission to finally cancel your subscription to the Washington Post.
I have an alt email address that's a very close match for the personal email address of some military dude who kept receiving confidential work emails with threatening footers about how much of a crime it was to disclose their content to unauthorized personnel. Took 'em a while to figure that out.
But thanks to him, every weekday is a holiday!
That could have been so much clearer:
Arrow chart comparing countries' opinion of China in spring 2024 and spring 2025, showing improvement in Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Britain, Spain, France, Canada, Germany, Australia Sweden and Japan, except in South Korea.
Noticed when I rotated the whole chart that Democrats seem to think that "other people" experience discrimination. Republicans think that nobody really does, perhaps a little, except them.
The Song of Choice, Peggy Seeger and/or The London Critics Group:

So close your eyes, stop your ears
Close your mouth, take it slow
Let others take the lead and you bring up the rear
And later you can say you didn't know
If you think you're 20% faster but you're actually 19% slower, you're 32.5% slower than you think.