Okay if all presentations were done like this, I would never get distracted because those visuals are both effective and hilarious. Between "WOULD" and the previous "SUPERGENE" slide with the bird on its back, I would've been rapt.

Their efficacy was confirmed against LIVE viruses including Ebola, Marburg, Nipah, Hendra, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), AND Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).

The study has been published in Science Advances. YES, it is PEER-REVIEWED.
• www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

🧪🧵⬇️

and how is someone disabled or elderly, without a car, in a place w/o accessible transit supposed to get to thrift/local shops or to people’s houses that post on buy nothing groups? those people aren’t facetious, they exist, I’ve been in that position. ur kinda proving OP’s point here

The people who wrote this study are, at best, fully incompetent! "Since the large-scale adoption of AI tools began with ChatGPT, we argue that, with high probability, articles published before the release of ChatGPT were written by humans"

Hahahaha.

Their "data set" is a Google spreadsheet with three columns and 72 rows! There isn't even good proof that they didn't totally fabricate it!

If this was a real study it would be published in a real journal not a fking press release. They don't even have the confidence in their theory to do what a lot of other AI companies do and commission real university scientists to run it.

This is inevitability propaganda by an AI company made to make you feel like you must use AI & it's bullshit. This methodology is bullshit, for many reasons, not least of which is, it is reliant on common crawl, now blocked by many of the biggest content producers online graphite.io/five-percent...

Automated text generation has existed for decades. "Dead internet" is from 2016. Markov chain text generation dates to at least 1984. The incentives to algorithmicly generate web text have been around since before 2010. Huge swaths of the internet have been case for seo/advertising slop for decades.