Eugene Vinitsky 🍒
eugenevinitsky.bsky.social
Eugene Vinitsky 🍒
@eugenevinitsky.bsky.social
Anti-cynic. Towards a weirder future. Reinforcement Learning, Autonomous Vehicles, transportation systems, the works. Asst. Prof at NYU
https://emerge-lab.github.io
https://www.admonymous.co/eugenevinitsky
It’s a cute puzzle
November 28, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Is there an example of an interesting phenomenon to model in this way that comes to mind? I’m always looking for one
November 28, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Yes of course, this is a line in MARL research. The problem is that we have no meaningful way to validate the models
November 28, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Yeah I should double check this too, I suppose it’s within terms of services to distill some of the Chinese models
November 28, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Great point. Fortunately no such problem here!
November 27, 2025 at 10:07 PM
Ah yeah I did not mean that form of synthetic data but genuinely synthetic data
November 27, 2025 at 9:43 PM
You’re right. I have no idea why I have this impulse to engage people on what I think is bad grounds
November 27, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Linear programs, sorry
November 27, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Contemplating this…
November 27, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Honestly preferable to the right. we are much better at solving LPs now
November 27, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Yeah would love to know
November 27, 2025 at 9:14 PM
100%
November 27, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Yeah and I just wish we could talk about that instead because whether 5 years or 50 years it’s fairly obviously coming in a serious way
November 27, 2025 at 9:09 PM
Yeah I hate code of that form and it’s causing serious issues for us. But it’s fairly obviously not a permanent fixture either
November 27, 2025 at 9:08 PM
It certainly is but it hasn’t really hit our politics yet
November 27, 2025 at 9:06 PM
I do remember! I don’t think this change would be downside free, only that the benefits of improved review would outweigh the downside. and its not as though there aren’t solutions such as having the supervisor co-sign all the reviews
November 27, 2025 at 9:06 PM
I think this person is correct though, this wave of anger is incoming even if the reasons are not the stated ones
November 27, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Yes! And this is a criticism and concern very worth of discussion
November 27, 2025 at 8:55 PM
English is not a very good language for writing specifications in is the issue
November 27, 2025 at 8:53 PM
Yeah I think in this case it’s totally bad.
November 27, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Totally, it’s just the most common critique I hear and I suspect it’s not the main concern
November 27, 2025 at 8:48 PM
My guess is no, that most of the opposition is around automation
November 27, 2025 at 8:34 PM