any errors just mean I'm not AI!
#1 P. Barnes fan
So we need to extract those costs.
-36% approve
-60% disapprove
His approval among Republicans went from 91% in January to 84% in November
news.gallup.com/poll/699221/...
So we need to extract those costs.
if someone sounds like an edgy teenager, it could be because they're an edgy teenager
i think about this a few times a year, as a reminder to have some grace when people anonymously say silly things
if someone sounds like an edgy teenager, it could be because they're an edgy teenager
i think about this a few times a year, as a reminder to have some grace when people anonymously say silly things
"voting for the status quo you dislike is better than voting for the other guys" isn't as compelling a pitch as Dem consultants think it is
"voting for the status quo you dislike is better than voting for the other guys" isn't as compelling a pitch as Dem consultants think it is
1. Senate Democrats cave, pass "clean CR"
2. House Republicans amend the bill, pass a "conservative CR", toss it back to the Senate
3. Senate Democrats ???
1. Senate Democrats cave, pass "clean CR"
2. House Republicans amend the bill, pass a "conservative CR", toss it back to the Senate
3. Senate Democrats ???
No more “lesser of two evils” voter alignment. It’s a small thing you can do to send the DNC a message.
No more “lesser of two evils” voter alignment. It’s a small thing you can do to send the DNC a message.
that takes real skill
Americans deserve better.
that takes real skill
Republicans have spent years trying to dismantle the ACA, and pretending Johnson will allow a vote on a clean ACA bill in the House is a fantasy.
I will be a no on this “deal.”
Republicans have spent years trying to dismantle the ACA, and pretending Johnson will allow a vote on a clean ACA bill in the House is a fantasy.
I will be a no on this “deal.”
I’m prepared to work toward a compromise, but this “deal” before us does not come close to meeting those terms. Voting NO.
Full statement:
I’m prepared to work toward a compromise, but this “deal” before us does not come close to meeting those terms. Voting NO.
Full statement:
if you won't cut Amazon entirely, cutting 50% or 80% of your purchases is still great!
go ahead and buy the special pet food you can't find in stores, but skip some stuff you don't really need right now
if you won't cut Amazon entirely, cutting 50% or 80% of your purchases is still great!
go ahead and buy the special pet food you can't find in stores, but skip some stuff you don't really need right now
change is only okay if it happens at a pace I'm comfy with
only Real Art should be displayed, reject all the meaningless new crap
protect Disney's copyrights at all costs
ban all the things I don't like, but do it "for the children"
change is only okay if it happens at a pace I'm comfy with
only Real Art should be displayed, reject all the meaningless new crap
protect Disney's copyrights at all costs
ban all the things I don't like, but do it "for the children"
without that limitation, I'm sure they would have written something like "US citizen alleged to have been struck from behind by bullet at around the time of an encounter with federal law enforcement agents"
without that limitation, I'm sure they would have written something like "US citizen alleged to have been struck from behind by bullet at around the time of an encounter with federal law enforcement agents"