Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
@fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
350 followers 140 following 19 posts
Lecturer in Criminology, University of Lincoln | social interaction in police and judicial settings 🧑‍⚖️💬👮‍♀️| ⚽️🏐🏀🇧🇷views are my own
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
I wonder what his party leader thinks about what he said.
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
I'm not sure what the best way to approach this is. Undergrad dissertations are rarely original anyway. The goal of producing a dissertation, in my view, is mainly pedagogical: learning the tricks of the trade.
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
Many of my undergraduate students want to do primary research for their dissertations.

Talking to colleagues, some question the value of doing so if there's data available out there - other surveys, interview transcripts, etc. - implying that there's no point in redoing what's already been done.
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
garydrawnsley.bsky.social
Today the School of Social & Political Sciences hosted the inaugural session of its MA International Relations Public Lecture Series organised by Marianna Charountaki & moderated by @drnickcowen.bsky.social. Thanks to Alam Saleh, Christos Kourtelis, Nasasra Mansour & Lesley Masters for participating
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
garydrawnsley.bsky.social
It’s Welcome Week at the Uni of #Lincoln & today the School of Social & Political Sciences organised a quiz for staff & new students. Do you know in which county Chequers is located& which UK city was the first to install traffic lights? How about the prison population in England?
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
profjonathanpotter.bsky.social
#1
Following on from my earlier thread about claims of “bias” in universities (link below 👇), I was struck by James Marriott’s column in today’s Times. It’s full of anecdote & caricature. The real story of UK universities is structural, financial, and political. 🧵
👉 bsky.app/profile/prof...
profjonathanpotter.bsky.social
Listening to Rest is Politics, Rest is Politics US, and reading respected commentators, it's striking how 'left-wing bias' in universities is now taken for granted. That matters, especially in the US, where academia faces political attack. Thoughts from having worked in US/UK universities. 🧵
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
vexorian.dev
So glad we are scorching the Earth so that a computer can, maybe after many tries, tell a guy how to make a Sandwich.
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
Terrific day visiting my alma mater to present our new research project.

On top of that, it has been an absolute pleasure to listen to so many innovative and exciting talks.

#EMCA research in police and legal settings continues to flourish.
charlesantaki.bsky.social
Fabio Ferraz de Almeida listens While his co-author starts their talk (via video) on how Brazilian police use vlogs to present a version of their work
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
On the train to Loughborough. Looking forward to the symposium (and catch up with DARGers) 😊
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
If that is not outright racism, very easy to spot, I don't know what is.
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
benpatrickwill.bsky.social
Academic authors, here's a peek into the black box of journal publishing from an journal editor if you can bear it:
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
elliotthoey.bsky.social
🚨 new #emca paper klaxon 🚨

on-duty police regularly have to deal with recording bystanders. if they decide to open interaction, how do they do so? Uwe and I investigate 🕵🏻 in Language in Society

🔓 OA: www.cambridge.org/core/service...
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
gsoh31.bsky.social
Decades of mechanistic talk about university degrees as if they were bundles of 'skills' and 'prep' are about to be proved completely wrong (obviously). Want to get a real boost? Do History or English.
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
kbneal.bsky.social
Well, yes, wouldn't it be nice if you knew the answers in advance, and could predict precisely which ideas will turn out to be enormous breakthroughs and which lead to dead ends... BUT THAT'S NOT HOW RESEARCH WORKS. *face palm*
robinbisson.bsky.social
Two senior @ukri.org figures this week have suggested unis could reduce how much research they do

“Concentrating on unique and high contributions & concentrating on less research, has the potential to bring the amount of activity into balance with research funding,” Steven Hill told #ARMA25

(1/2)
Research England official: universities could do ‘less’ R&D - Research Professional News
Arma 2025: Director of research asks whether system should provide “disincentives for lower-quality research”
www.researchprofessionalnews.com
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
mcslaven.bsky.social
There are reasons that most UK universities are in trouble which have nothing to do with them. The managers have a hard job. However, some are in over their heads, putting out corporate statements about a "clear vision and plan" which no one has seen
No-confidence vote in University of Lincoln bosses is passed - BBC News
Academics at the University of Lincoln call for compulsory redundancies to be ruled out.
www.bbc.co.uk
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
jonathanhealey.bsky.social
Universities do research that may not be commercially viable now but will be transformative down the line. They correct for market failure. If all they do is think like enterprises then they become a part of that market failure.
mrfw17thc.bsky.social
Of course, any academic worth their salt would then ask whose research will lay the foundation for any of this activity ... but expertise doesn't seem to be a prerequisite for commercialisation.
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
One of my favourite places in Finland. If you like fish, try Sampo for the traditional Finnish muikku. Otherwise, try Boka for some Balkan food. Enjoy!
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
profjonathanpotter.bsky.social
Listening to Rest is Politics, Rest is Politics US, and reading respected commentators, it's striking how 'left-wing bias' in universities is now taken for granted. That matters, especially in the US, where academia faces political attack. Thoughts from having worked in US/UK universities. 🧵
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
In a time when people are obsessed with big data and statistics, this is a must-read!
charlesantaki.bsky.social
Wondered about (or goggled at) how politicians use statistics?

Michael Billig and Cristina Marinho have a new book out on just that subject, and it's a cracker.

www.cambridge.org/core/books/p...
Politicians Manipulating Statistics
Cambridge Core - Politics: General Interest - Politicians Manipulating Statistics
www.cambridge.org
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
dingemansemark.bsky.social
A year ago our faculty commissioned & adopted guidance on GenAI and research integrity. Preamble below, pdf at osf.io/preprints/os..., text also at ideophone.org/generative-a...

Key to these guidelines is a values-first rather than a technology-first approach, based on NL code of research conduct
Preamble

All research at our institution, from ideation and execution to analysis and reporting, is bound by the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. This code specifies five core values that organise and inform research conduct: Honesty, Scrupulousness, Transparency, Independence and Responsibility.

One way to summarise the guidelines in this document is to say they are about taking these core values seriously. When it comes to using Generative AI in or for research, the question is if and how this can be done honestly, scrupulously, transparently, independently, and responsibly.

A key ethical challenge is that most current Generative AI undermines these values by design [3–5; details below]. Input data is legally questionable; output reproduces biases and erases authorship; fine-tuning involves exploitation; access is gated; versioning is opaque; and use taxes the environment.

While most of these issues apply across societal spheres, there is something especially pernicious about text generators in academia, where writing is not merely an output format but a means of thinking, crediting, arguing, and structuring thoughts. Hollowing out these skills carries foundational risks.

A common argument for Generative AI is a promise of higher productivity [5]. Yet productivity does not equal insight, and when kept unchecked it may hinder innovation and creativity [6, 7]. We do not need more papers, faster; we rather need more thoughtful, deep work, also known as slow science [8–10].

For these reasons, the first principle when it comes to Generative AI is to not use it unless you can do so honestly, scrupulously, transparently, independently and responsibly. The ubiquity of tools like ChatGPT is no reason to skimp on standards of research integrity; if anything, it requires more vigilance.
Reposted by Fabio Ferraz de Almeida
sefe-ofelia.bsky.social
It is great to hear about our PhD students' research projects at the UoL PGT event👏👏
fferrazdealmeida.bsky.social
It's that time of the year when undergrads start panicking about their dissertation.

Today, one of them sent me a draft chapter and asked for my feedback. The email ended with 'good luck'. Not exactly what a supervisor would expect (or like to read) 😅