@fpait.bsky.social
I won’t watch either. Boycotted the previous 2. Didn’t solve anything: Russia invaded Ukraine, Qatar had Hamas start the war against Israel. At least I wasn’t even a minor accomplice.
December 7, 2025 at 3:37 AM
I won’t watch either. Boycotted the previous 2. Didn’t solve anything: Russia invaded Ukraine, Qatar had Hamas start the war against Israel. At least I wasn’t even a minor accomplice.
Palavras têm consequências.
December 6, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Palavras têm consequências.
Então basta de falar do congresso dessa forma que levou ao descrédito atual.
Critique ações, não a instituição como fazem extremistas.
Critique ações, não a instituição como fazem extremistas.
December 6, 2025 at 3:01 PM
Então basta de falar do congresso dessa forma que levou ao descrédito atual.
Critique ações, não a instituição como fazem extremistas.
Critique ações, não a instituição como fazem extremistas.
Não é certo criticar a instituição do congresso como inimiga. Coisa de bolsonarista ou adepto do PCO.
Precisamos de melhores congressistas. Não devemos adotar a linguagem dos inimigos da democracia.
Precisamos de melhores congressistas. Não devemos adotar a linguagem dos inimigos da democracia.
December 6, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Não é certo criticar a instituição do congresso como inimiga. Coisa de bolsonarista ou adepto do PCO.
Precisamos de melhores congressistas. Não devemos adotar a linguagem dos inimigos da democracia.
Precisamos de melhores congressistas. Não devemos adotar a linguagem dos inimigos da democracia.
Really sad how Americans don’t know the basics of civics. I did not see that coming.
One could see signs in the press, and in politicians. But the people? No I didn’t know.
One could see signs in the press, and in politicians. But the people? No I didn’t know.
December 6, 2025 at 1:06 PM
Really sad how Americans don’t know the basics of civics. I did not see that coming.
One could see signs in the press, and in politicians. But the people? No I didn’t know.
One could see signs in the press, and in politicians. But the people? No I didn’t know.
It doesn’t appear so.
November 29, 2025 at 4:34 PM
It doesn’t appear so.
Reposted
My concern is that's an assumption, especially when Gen A are growing in information environments dominated by platforms and the incentives they offer, and, as a society, we aren't educating them to navigate this new reality because we think we're still in the old information environment.
November 29, 2025 at 11:43 AM
My concern is that's an assumption, especially when Gen A are growing in information environments dominated by platforms and the incentives they offer, and, as a society, we aren't educating them to navigate this new reality because we think we're still in the old information environment.
Reposted
In the platform economy speed of engagement is rewarded over slow facts and deliberation, so populist and conspiratorial moral-epistemic systems work extremely well, while slower functional VDA and technocratic moral-epistemic systems perform poorly.
November 29, 2025 at 11:35 AM
In the platform economy speed of engagement is rewarded over slow facts and deliberation, so populist and conspiratorial moral-epistemic systems work extremely well, while slower functional VDA and technocratic moral-epistemic systems perform poorly.
Yes.
And, individuals have agency. They can stop to think, or they can choose not to. The means to analyze are easily available.
And, individuals have agency. They can stop to think, or they can choose not to. The means to analyze are easily available.
November 29, 2025 at 11:42 AM
Yes.
And, individuals have agency. They can stop to think, or they can choose not to. The means to analyze are easily available.
And, individuals have agency. They can stop to think, or they can choose not to. The means to analyze are easily available.
I see a competition between rational, scientific, or analytic view of the world opposed to a disordered set of conspiracy theories. Yes, the latter is political.
But intellectual and moral thought isn’t primarily political. I believe reason should prevail, but as you argue, the task isn’t easy.
But intellectual and moral thought isn’t primarily political. I believe reason should prevail, but as you argue, the task isn’t easy.
November 29, 2025 at 11:39 AM
I see a competition between rational, scientific, or analytic view of the world opposed to a disordered set of conspiracy theories. Yes, the latter is political.
But intellectual and moral thought isn’t primarily political. I believe reason should prevail, but as you argue, the task isn’t easy.
But intellectual and moral thought isn’t primarily political. I believe reason should prevail, but as you argue, the task isn’t easy.
It should be possible to block the political dominance of the disordered discourse because each of its claims can be seen as false by people with basic school level education in science, humanities, and civics. They only make sense as a complete package of lies.
Can the lies keep up with the facts?
Can the lies keep up with the facts?
November 29, 2025 at 11:29 AM
It should be possible to block the political dominance of the disordered discourse because each of its claims can be seen as false by people with basic school level education in science, humanities, and civics. They only make sense as a complete package of lies.
Can the lies keep up with the facts?
Can the lies keep up with the facts?