Graeme Edgeler
graemeedgeler.bsky.social
Graeme Edgeler
@graemeedgeler.bsky.social
Check on the Executive
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
The stuff you find when you actually read the RCTs in a systematic review...

This paper is one of the foundational studies on vitamin D to prevent respiratory infections in kids. Cited 1,400 times as per Google Scholar.
November 26, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Juries are not perfect.

Many of the worst miscarriages of justice have followed jury trials.

But the merit of juries is not so much the power they have, but the power they prevent others from having.

They mean a judge cannot just nod-along with prosecution evidence and give a guilty verdict.
November 25, 2025 at 7:12 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
This week I am writing about obeying illegal military orders.

Happy to hear any informed views and of any interesting/useful information, on or off record.

DMs open.
November 25, 2025 at 8:15 AM
If anyone is concerned about the renaming of Rongotai, while you can't change it for the next election (or probably the one after that), you do have the power to elect a local MP willing to read the 1½ pages of public comment and represent your opposition for the next time it comes up.
I fucking HATE "Wellington Bays"

Bring back Rongotai.
November 23, 2025 at 6:46 AM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
If you have been sharing that Malwarebytes article on the Gmail thing, you should note the giant correction up top.

www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/20...
November 22, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
This government has not taken a single meaningful step to tackle the causes of the horrendous inefficiencies in the criminal justice system, instead rushing to dismantle trial by jury.

Legal professionals have offered numerous alternatives to address the backlog.

Ministers are not listening.
November 21, 2025 at 7:57 AM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Parliamentary sovereignty is one of the most deceptively difficult things to write about accurately, concisely and accessibly.

Credit to David Torrance & @paolosandro.bsky.social for showing the deceptively difficult is not the infuriatingly impossible.

commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-bri...
Parliamentary sovereignty
A short research briefing on the principle of parliamentary sovereignty, its origins and contemporary application.
commonslibrary.parliament.uk
November 19, 2025 at 6:02 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
The screengrab below is nuts. "This officer was so indiscriminate about shooting protesters that plaintiff, as a matter of law, cannot demonstrate he was targeted in retaliation for his First Amendment activity."

DO WE NOT SEE THE PROBLEM HERE
6th Cir. holds that because police officer also shot pepper balls at George Floyd protesters who weren't filming police, plaintiff (causing permanent vision loss) cannot show the officer shot him in retaliation for filming.

QI for officer.

ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/25/11...
November 19, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
I urge members of the legal profession to realize that prosecuting individuals who seek to overturn the constitutional order is not "retaliation" in any normatively significant sense.
November 17, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
By now in the semester, the students in my sentencing and punishment seminar are pretty used to grim stuff—not to mention self-selection into electives means most had a lot of background awareness coming in.

But this pic—of group “therapy” at San Quentin—still produced a class-wide gasp of horror.
November 18, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
When Owen writes "most interesting" you should read that as "most insane thing that could possibly be true given these absolute idiots."
Everyone's missing potentially the most interesting thing about this order, which is the judge's finding that Halligan may have returned an indictment that was never presented to the jury
November 17, 2025 at 6:33 PM
There are definitely movies I have seen because I saw random shorts (usually YouTube, rather than TikTok).
Have mostly liked the movies.
I didn’t like the show Euphoria very much when it was on HBO, but apparently I like it when it’s chopped up into niblets on TikTok? I don’t know what this says about the show, but it doesn’t speak well of me
November 17, 2025 at 4:38 AM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Oh wow @reuters.com got the photo here:
November 14, 2025 at 9:25 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Yeah, this.

Two things can be true:

1. Maxwell def should not get special treatment.

2. The treatment Maxwell is getting likely barely qualifies as “acceptable” in many European prisons.

But no one really wants to hear “the path to fairness is to treat everyone humanely!”
I think it is definitely a story that Maxwell is getting preferential treatment behind bars, but good luck writing that story without encouraging the dehumanization of incarcerated people.
November 14, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
not to absolve them of their other work, but every so often the Bee posts a banger
November 14, 2025 at 7:39 PM
Declaring on a news media website that someone currently before a court facing criminal charges that could be the subject of a jury trial are not innocent is generally not advised.

www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/heath...
Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: The woman in the Jevon McSkimming saga wasn't innocent here
So it turns out the woman with whom Jevon McSkimming had an affair, whose warnings police ignored and who police charged instead of investigating McSkimmin
www.newstalkzb.co.nz
November 14, 2025 at 1:45 AM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
If you have tenure at Texas A&M and aren't maliciously emailing the president a dozen times every day to ask if you can say this or you can say that, then what's the point in having tenure?
COLLEGE STATION, Texas (AP) — Texas A&M adopts policy requiring professors to get OK from school president to discuss certain race and gender issues.
November 13, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Also worth noting: we appointed a bunch of these people to trusted positions when they were clearly fleeing the consequences of their own ethical lapses at police (after McSkimmings' suspension). Did no-one ask them why they were leaving? Did no-one ask the police? Or the IPCA?
November 13, 2025 at 10:57 AM
So the issue by which I am most exercised now isn't McSkimming, but everyone else. One appointment can fall through the cracks. But all of these statutory appointments overseen by the Public Service Commission, first as Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner, but then appointments at Social Investment
November 13, 2025 at 9:56 AM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
"bluesky will suspend you for anything vaguely resembling a death threat" is maybe the single most consistent moderation policy they have I don't know why anyone is surprised by this one

yes, even if it's a reference to song lyrics
The account owner of @sarahkendzior.bsky.social was suspended for 72 hours for expressing a desire to shoot the author of an article. The post, made 11/10, stated: "I want to shoot the author of this article just to watch him die." 1/2
November 12, 2025 at 7:40 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Llandudno Remembrance Parade 2025 witnessed an act so audacious that Bond would have been impressed. This individual waltzed in, mingled with the Chain Gang et al and laid a wreath. The catcher? No one knows who the feck he is. Whoever he is he Walted big and hard. I'm not even angry, I'm impressed.
November 11, 2025 at 7:18 PM
In which a then 46-year old Winston Peters acquires the moniker "young" :-)

I'll take it!
November 11, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
Anne Twomey is turning into a YouTube machine with her series on the dismissal of the Whitlam government—and now she's promising "a special video in a unique location" for the 50th anniversary on Tuesday. Constitutional and political history fans lesssgoooooo
Constitutional Clarion
This channel is about constitutional matters - largely Australian, but sometimes broader international constitutional issues. It is conducted by Anne Twomey, who is a Professor Emerita of the Univers...
www.youtube.com
November 9, 2025 at 5:26 AM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
the thing about this is that a) small states do not have any interests that are inherent to their size (no less than james madison understood this) b) the senate is organized along party lines which makes the small/big distinction almost irrelevant and c) the filibuster has never been used this way
Underrated aspect of killing the filibuster is making pundit hacks at Cook Political p-p-p-piss their pants
November 8, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Reposted by Graeme Edgeler
In the scheme of things 9 million dollars isn't a lot. Bit sure as shit ain't nothing. Its 9 million dollars somehow spent on getting Michelin to review some restaurants. How does that even work. It cost the crown 9 million dollars to get some restaurants reviewed. wtf. Honestly, how is that 9M.
November 7, 2025 at 8:17 PM