Helen Lewis
banner
helenlewis.bsky.social
Helen Lewis
@helenlewis.bsky.social
Staff writer, The Atlantic | Author, Difficult Women (2020) and The Genius Myth (2025) | Podcaster, Page 94 | Doom scroller, the internet | uk.bookshop.org/shop/helenlewis
This is a very good example of how the best interview questions are rarely hostile.
December 2, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Delighted to report that my years of relentless pro-Larkin proselytising helped get Aubade into the TV series Devs. www.youtube.com/watch?v=TP4y...
Devs - Lyndon Falls (Aubade)
YouTube video by TheHollowShrine
www.youtube.com
December 2, 2025 at 12:59 PM
They said it couldn't be done!
December 2, 2025 at 12:36 PM
ah so you haven’t read it, got you
October 20, 2025 at 8:05 PM
man, it would be SO embarrassing if the piece discussed the Khashoggi case and you just hadn’t read it before posting
October 20, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Yeah, I know, I know.
October 18, 2025 at 11:34 AM
As I say in the piece, public beheadings are no longer done. Also the comedians couldn’t “say what they liked” — that was very much the point of the piece. They agreed not to mock religion or the royals.
October 18, 2025 at 10:35 AM
I mean, Jes Staley‘s friendship with Epstein was tolerated for many years until the bad publicity became overwhelming. And you know, I’m personally *proud* that the left (specifically feminism) has led on ending the culture of turning a blind eye to powerful men being sex pests 🤷‍♀️
October 17, 2025 at 12:12 PM
It wasn’t a joke, though, it was ragebait. And this post is not a sincere clarification but an invitation to your followers to tell you that you were actually right all along, and you’ve been unfairly traduced—not least by framing me as “angry” when I was very polite.
October 17, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Yeah; he was outed as a sex pest by the NYT, which is leftwing — plus, very clearly the right does not cancel people for being sex pests, cf the current US president. So it was a leftwing cancellation. That doesn’t mean it was wrong, which I think people are assuming was implied.
October 17, 2025 at 11:38 AM
You've lost me here, I'm afraid.
October 17, 2025 at 9:31 AM
Hey, if I write something dumb feel free to call it out. All I ask is that you read the piece first!
October 17, 2025 at 9:27 AM
Yeah, I really went easy on Louis CK here. There’s no way you actually read the piece, is there? (Or, I’m guessing, any of my articles on the Epstein case.)
October 17, 2025 at 7:15 AM
I know. I can't believe Jonathan didn't want to wingman. Something about "having a job of my own, thank you"
October 16, 2025 at 12:36 PM
I deleted it because the conversation it generated was ill-informed and not productive. I stand by the sentiments completely & will happily repeat them in a better forum. This violent misogynist should never have been put in a women’s prison. All the best, Stu.
October 1, 2025 at 11:51 PM