Tout ce que j'ai retenu de ce livre c'est son racisme, tout le monde à un nom sauf les arabes.

Bravo les "universalistes" d'avoir pris une cause aussi ambiguë moralement que "Si une femme dans votre organisation est victime de viol, ne la virez pas si elle en parle" et d'avoir réussi à en déduire que le féminisme était allé trop loin.

people is used to describe me or my relatives, combatting those ideas for Palestinians is also combatting them for me.

a torn up Quran or a severed pig head in front of a Mosque. I also don't think the singular focus on Palestine prevents from fighting racism and islamophobia at home. In the end it is the same biggotry that is to be fought, the same rhethoric used against Palestinians as regressive barbaric

Finally I hope that if we can humanize the Muslims from far away, that Westerners have no chance of ever meeting, it's going to be easier to humanize their neighbors or coworkers.

That's why I think the focus on Palestine is that big, also because the image of a blown up baby is more angrying than

that hurt us in the West.

Second, my life is the West is not subjected to the same amount of danger, there has been attacks against Muslims, some of us died because of it, but we are not getting shot at in the daily. I see an urgency in acting for Palestine because of it.

our civilizational values" went straight to "They aren't as human as we are, their deaths count less than Israeli deaths". They really unveiled (islamophobes love doing that apparently) their real thoughts after the beginning of the genocide. So fighting for Palestinians is fighting the same racists

My 2 cents, it might just be the way I'm thinking about this and not reflecting the thoughts of any other of my coreligionaries.

First of all, the discourse around Israël has an ability to put to light bigotry, those who were hiding under the "They are culturally regressive and cannot adapt to

Ben évidemment, l'asso s'appelle "Laïcité 35", of course c'est un truc de racistes.