Jordan
@jdw11.bsky.social
290 followers 88 following 110 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jdw11.bsky.social
Staples has been really fascinating for me to read after all the PwJ folks.
jdw11.bsky.social
But the full account of that Christo-logic is just what I attempted in my book, including the “dilemma of creation” implied by (1) Maximus’s point here about God never needing evil and yet (2) his other point that one would need to know God fully first to know creation rightly.
jdw11.bsky.social
But Maximus goes on in that same text to argue for an identity indeed, the Logos is the logoi and the reverse. Here again one must trace the Christo-logic thoroughly to see that this other type of identity isn’t somehow not an identity. So the person here limits himself to options Maximus transcends
jdw11.bsky.social
Moreover, Maximus’s critique of “Origenism” in Amb 7 isn’t simply a negation of the absolute’s self-othering. It’s first of all a rejection of a *serial* and thus merely finite self and relation that, qua finite, is either perpetually insecure or a mere external contrast.
jdw11.bsky.social
absoluteness—or as he says of the PhG in the preface to the science of logic, it establishes “the idea of the absolute.” Reading this the way one reads a treatise on being is a prolonged category error.
jdw11.bsky.social
He doesn’t get Hegel right, since Hegel always thinks the Absolute’s “self-Othering” except as Trinity, and thence any relative difference through Christ. Also, the PhG is not a straightforward ontology; it is a phenomenology, ie an account of how finite reason experiences its own mediated..
jdw11.bsky.social
I’m with you
jdw11.bsky.social
Well, I wouldn’t say that. For an intro to Hegel himself, I’d start with Houlgate and/or Peter Hodgson (Hegel & Christian Theology).
jdw11.bsky.social
For Rose, I recommend the following and in this order: Mourning Becomes the Law, Dialectic of Nihilism, The Broken Middle, Hegel Contra Sociology, Love’s Work—that’s a good start!
jdw11.bsky.social
Just did, ya dopes
Reposted by Jordan
troutsky.bsky.social
Rahner is famous for the identity of economic and immanent Trinity. Here he explains that this identity is what Hegel would call a speculative proposition: an identity which includes difference as its self-difference. A living sameness which produces and sublates otherness.
jdw11.bsky.social
I’m here for it and putting this in my basket
jdw11.bsky.social
Damn looks great
Reposted by Jordan
jdw11.bsky.social
“And I won’t admit I ever didn’t.”
jdw11.bsky.social
I’d add IV.
jdw11.bsky.social
His anti-Hegel invective is so passé.
jdw11.bsky.social
Co-sign, and not just about the thread but also about the book. Get it asap.
andrewrillera.bsky.social
The NT does not identify & describe God as the one "who ultimately crucified Jesus," but rather as the God "who raised Jesus from the dead.”

Acts 5:30; Rom 4:24; 6:4; 8:11; 10:9; 1 Cor 6:14; 15:15; 2 Cor 4:14; Gal 1:1; Eph 1:20; Col 2:12; 1 Thess 1:10; Heb 13:20; 1 Pet 1:21.🧵