There are TikToks about this!

A study just suggested this - AI information erases Dunning-Kruger in that it’s now *not only* low-knowledge becoming overconfident in whatever they think they know

What I think as a matter of logic is not the same as what might fly with (barely) supporting a good faith basis. Waive is a choice and maybe more rational across parties — like just start litigating now, here. Default seems more idiosyncratic and subjective? But maybe not with the SAD cases

If it’s ever happened before in a similar case with sort of similar parties, they could rationalize that they inferred a good faith basis it will also happen here

Bootstrapping by extremely stretched inference-like reasoning

Heaven and Earth Grocery Store — a beautiful book -- has a character named Monkeypants, book is set in the 1920s and 30s

Will you buy some beer for me

This is not an answer but could you do the same with “constitute as”? Where does that come from? Asking for a bunch of lawyers and law professors

To quote an actually good post on altanta intown Nextdoor when the posts got into owl discourse after one stole a guys hat on morning run: ”Owls are particularly stupid”

From the Library of Congress card catalog - always at the ready for moments like these

*shapes to represent issues

Pam Karlan taught us collateral estoppel using shapes to issues in the case - kid-friendly explanation of tough concepts 🤩🤩🤩

What are your thoughts on dancing with the stars having Prince night? It’s tomorrow 😬

This info from just this morning is low-stakes but quite terribly wrong. And free — so I just shrug and move on after making fun of it

especially in a credence good market (thinking of legal services) and especially when its use can be hidden or touted in a kind of shape-shifting way

What is German word for repeatedly flipping bad charging cord and plugging and replugging in futile hopes it will start working again or at least give your phone like 5 percent