Jens Friis Lund
@jenslund.bsky.social
720 followers 34 following 4 posts
Political ecologist. Interested in carbon removal, degrowth, justice.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
jenslund.bsky.social
Scholars and activists are invited to send short reflection pieces on political ecology in the run-up for POLLEN24 to JPE/Grassroots, Ecología Política, and the Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania (JGAT). More info here: grassrootsjpe.org/view/resourc...
Grassroots JPE Resource
grassrootsjpe.org
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
glenpeters.bsky.social
Carbon, Capture, & Storage is not really something for oil & gas producers (other than storage infrastructure).

The ones who need CCS the most, like cement, steel, waste, etc, are not the oil & gas industry (in case you had not noticed).

www.iea.org/reports/the-...
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
ketanjoshi.co
This survey from 2009 is really a wild read. Most climate scientists surveyed thought 4-5C by end of century was the most likely, and that 2C was close to impossible to achieve.

Imagine the results if you took this exact survey again today....

www.theguardian.com/environment/...
World will not meet 2C warming target, climate change experts agree
This article is more than 14 years old
Guardian poll reveals almost nine out of 10 climate experts do not believe current political efforts will keep warming below 2C
David Adam, environment correspondent
Tue 14 Apr 2009 01.01 CEST
145
Almost nine out of 10 climate scientists do not believe political efforts to restrict global warming to 2C will succeed, a Guardian poll reveals today. An average rise of 4-5C by the end of this century is more likely, they say, given soaring carbon emissions and political constraints.

Such a change would disrupt food and water supplies, exterminate thousands of species of plants and animals and trigger massive sea level rises that would swamp the homes of hundreds of millions of people.

The poll of those who follow global warming most closely exposes a widening gulf between political rhetoric and scientific opinions on climate change. While policymakers and campaigners focus on the 2C
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
wyeates.bsky.social
“Just five rich global north countries are responsible for the majority (51%) of planned new oil and gas extraction to 2050: the US, Canada, Australia, Norway and the UK. These countries have the responsibility to move first to phase out fossil fuel production.”

www.theguardian.com/environment/...
‘Insanity’: petrostates planning huge expansion of fossil fuels, says UN report
Plans by nations including Saudi Arabia, the US and UAE would blow climate targets and ‘throw humanity’s future into question’
www.theguardian.com
jenslund.bsky.social
Highly recommend this👇
livable4all.bsky.social
Very interesting #degrowth #livable #economics #environment podcast: Tipping Point: 50 years ago, they told us what was coming. Why were they ignored? A podcast story of "The Limits to Growth": The study, the backlash – and its legacy tippingpoint-podcast.com via @katyrshields.bsky.social
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
robertferry.bsky.social
How can we build a broad coalition for climate action and bring about the massive political movement needed?

1. Focus on planting a seed of desire for a post carbon world.
2. Avoid doom and fear narratives.
3. Avoid narratives of sacrifice or degrowth.
4. Avoid blaming, shaming, or finger pointing.
Politically Effective Communications in the Era of Climate Despair
The strategy of climate apocalypse has lost its effectiveness and it’s time for something new.
medium.com
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
ketanjoshi.co
Just revisiting this interview with Dr Saleemul Huq, recorded in March 2022.

I think he shows quite well how gross it can be sometimes when white people dismiss COP as a total irrelevancy, when it is still a valuable place to fight these battles on loss, damage, adaptation and accountability.
The Climate Pod: Climate Citizen: Addressing Loss And Damage
This is Part Three of our four-part series, Climate Citizen, in collaboration with This week, we look at the critical need to reckon with the loss and damage created by the climate crisis and hold ac...
theclimatepod.libsyn.com
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
kimberlynicholas.bsky.social
Just 1% of global population are regular flyers; they represent 50% of climate pollution from flights. (That was me until 2012!) For regular flyers, it's the biggest slice of your climate footprint.
How to start flying less personally, at work, collectively:
wecanfixit.substack.com/i/70289095/a... 🧪
How to fly less
Facts: Americans do care about climate; Feelings: Climate dissonance; Action: How to cut your own flying, and shift the system.
wecanfixit.substack.com
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
katemac.bsky.social
“Nordhaus’s list of the indoor activities free of any effects from climate disruption include manufacturing, mining, transportation, communication, finance, insurance, real estate, trade, private sector services, and government services.” theintercept.com/2023/10/29/w...
When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics
How an elite clique of math-addled economists hijacked climate policy.
theintercept.com
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
ketanjoshi.co
Probably the least surprising but perhaps still the most egregious / shameless is their net zero claims being 100% "net" and 0% "zero"

All these offsets come from questionable projects, too - some worse than others.

ketanjoshi.co/2023/10/28/n...
netflix offsets nearly all of their emissions
jenslund.bsky.social
Consider submitting to Journal of Political Ecology - no fees and run entirely on academic labour:) One of the editors, Simon Batterbury, has also a long list of decent open access journals here, simonbatterbury.wordpress.com/2015/10/25/l...
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
ketanjoshi.co
This is a tacit acknowledgement that offsets aren't a generous gift from corporations to climate action: they are a trade. The company pays a fee, and they get to scribble out as much of their climate responsibility as they please.

www.marketwatch.com/story/whos-d...
The world is vastly off track for meeting essential climate goals, and in a worrying and unexpected plot twist, climate advocates are now careening toward a terrible mistake that could set back climate action by decades.

To win on climate, humanity must mobilize trillions of dollars in private green investment, particularly in emerging economies where greenhouse gas emissions are skyrocketing. Unfortunately, despite the urgency of the problem, some of the very groups seeking to accelerate climate action are poised to choke off one of the largest sources of climate finance for the developing world: the global voluntary carbon market (VCM).

The private sector is ready to do its part to finance climate action in the developing world. Over the past few years, thousands of global companies have voluntarily committed to achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century. Many companies are taking steps to meet their targets and are prepared to invest far more. 

Of course companies should deliver s
jenslund.bsky.social
The POLLEN24 Conference CfP is out! Join us in Lima, Lund or Dodoma to discuss how political ecology can nurture plural and just socio-ecologial futures! Deadline: December 15th, 2023 // More info: pollen2024.brick.site/call #POLLEN24
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
wimcarton.bsky.social
Calling everyone working on political ecologies of carbon removal, carbon offsetting and net zero!

We're now inviting abstracts for our CDR stream at POLLEN24. Deadline is 1 December, more details in the call text below.

Join us in Lund next June!

politicalecologynetwork.org/2023/10/23/p...