Jianghao Liu
@jianghaoliu.bsky.social
88 followers 190 following 65 posts
postdoc on cognitive neuroscience. I’m interested in mental imagery, mental simulation and aphantasia. my website: https://jianghao-liu.github.io
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
📢preprint (first time single author)
An attention-based neural model of subjective imagery and aphantasia

Aphantasia show us the reactivation of the visual cortex (culminating so called imagery generation!) is NOT sufficient for imagery experience. But what is missing?
doi.org/10.31234/osf...
🧵1/8
OSF
doi.org
Reposted by Jianghao Liu
chazfirestone.bsky.social
This is a big one! A 4-year writing project over many timezones, arguing for a reimagining of the influential "core knowledge" thesis.

Led by @daweibai.bsky.social, we argue that much of our innate knowledge of the world is not "conceptual" in nature, but rather wired into perceptual processing. 👇
Screenshot of a paper abstract:

“Core knowledge” refers to a set of cognitive systems that underwrite early representations of the physical and social world, appear universally across cultures, and likely result from our genetic endowment. Although this framework is canonically considered as a hypothesis about early emerging conception — how we think and reason about the world — here we present an alternative view: that many such representations are inherently perceptual in nature. This “core perception” view explains an intriguing (and otherwise mysterious) aspect of core-knowledge processes and representations: that they also operate in adults, where they display key empirical signatures of perceptual processing. We first illustrate this overlap using recent work on “core physics”, the domain of core knowledge concerned with physical objects, representing properties such as persistence through time, cohesion, solidity, and causal interactions. We review evidence that adult vision incorporates exactly these representations of core physics, while also displaying empirical signatures of genuinely perceptual mechanisms, such as rapid and automatic operation on the basis of specific sensory inputs, informational encapsulation, and interaction with other perceptual processes. We further argue that the same pattern holds for other areas of core knowledge, including geometrical, numerical, and social domains. In light of this evidence, we conclude that many infant results appealing to precocious reasoning abilities are better explained by sophisticated perceptual mechanisms shared by infants and adults. Our core-perception view elevates the status of perception in accounting for the origins of conceptual knowledge, and generates a range of ready-to-test hypotheses in developmental psychology, vision science, and more.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Thanks! This is exactly the idea! I’m trying to dissociate these stages by behavior, if possible.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Any #aphantasics here? We’re looking for participants for a short test on memory (~15 min, online, aph. or not).
You can do it right on your phone, just using your fingers — no setup needed. The task is quite challenging... at least it was for me! 😅
www.etabbane.fr/experiments/...
Memocrush
www.etabbane.fr
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
There is a new theoretical neural model paper on this, osf.io/preprints/ps...

I’m also looking forward to reliable behavior measurement apart from introspection.
OSF
osf.io
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
how about someone doing conceptual simulation without any imagery experience? This lead to the same change of pattern in the report and similar change in neural activity.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Cool. The approximate estimation of number doesn’t necessarily to be rendered as visual imagery, it could be conceptual and abstract. Thus collapse may reflect the quantity change but not the quality of imagery, right ?
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Absolutely. I agree that the pattern of internal thought changes. I think the question is HOW to probe subjective report from behavior. The neuro imaging is another story.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
This is an excellent example, which shows a well-defined way of introspection of rotating nuggets, by its N. The question is 1/this is again introspection, how objective and reliable it is? 2/is the task defining a “tracking aphantasia” instead of aphantasia of representing an imagined nugget?
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Very inspiring study exploring psychogenic aphantasia! Well done !
juhasilvanto.bsky.social
affective-autonomic pathway to acquired aphantasia: appr. 60% of acquired cases of aphantasia have psychogenic origin. In the interoceptive model, affective disorders disrupt the integration of bodily & cognitive signals needed for imagery. work with Yoko Nagai www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
Autonomic, Neurodevelopmental, and Early Adversity Correlates of Acquired Aphantasia
Aphantasia (the inability to voluntarily generate mental imagery) has traditionally been studied as a congenital or neurological condition. However, h…
www.sciencedirect.com
Reposted by Jianghao Liu
thomasandrillon.bsky.social
📜 ¡New preprint! 📜

𝐑𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐨𝐧 𝐃𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬
osf.io/preprints/ps...
🧪🧠

With amazing alumni from @mesec-community.bsky.social and including:
@zefanzheng.bsky.social
@robertchisciure.bsky.social
@jaanaru.bsky.social
@bechir-jarraya.bsky.social
OSF
osf.io
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
5/ However, how aphantasia impacts distinct aspects of attention (selective, sustained, shifting, etc.) and how these, in turn, interact with conscious experience remains an intriguing empirical question. The show will go on :)
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
4/ I love the idea that aphantasia is associated with shifting attention inward! I mentioned the shift between external and internal states of attention, or sensory vs. memory content, I should have been more clear on this.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
3/ Deficits appears to be present in attentional template, stroop tasks and reduced P300 in oddball task, as recently found by Rebecca, Monzel and @andreablomkvist.bsky.social. Thus, it's task-dependent. Similar behaviour may also due to other strategy, especially when task is relatively easy.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
2/ Increasing neural evidence points to altered activity in FP attention networks in aphantasia, but how these neural differences map onto behavior remains unclear; But current behavioral findings on executive or attentional control are inconclusive.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Many thanks for these advice, Reshanne! @kerblooee.bsky.social and I totally agree with you that the attention model should have been more specific, since the term of attention means many things. The paper draws a neural model, based on fronto-parietal attention networks
🧵1/
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
Another one, among many others, to show (imagery is tiny for cognition) vs. (imagery affects everything in litterature) 😆
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
8/8 hopefully this new theoretical framework could provide additional thought to advance current models of imagery in the context of subjective experience! Comments are welcome ✋
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
7/8 I also discussed how the attention model:
-> explain phenomenological aspects of aphantasia: involuntary imagery, unconscious imagery, spectrum of vividness (hypo- vs. aph.), acquired aph., unimodal and multimodal, etc.
-> provide testable hypothesis for future studies !
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
6/8 In this model, aphantasia is primarily a deficit in top-down attentional control. While some subliminal or preconscious visual processing is preserved, whereas conscious imagery is limited due to reduced functional disconnection.
jianghaoliu.bsky.social
5/8 i proposed a putative neural basis of such process in typical visualizers:
-> dorsal attention network: hierarchical processing: generation (lIFG, IPS); integration (FIN), and amplification (PFC)
-> ventral attention network: switching between internal/external states and suppresses distractors.