joseph
@josephonline.bsky.social
Moderator of NBC's Meet The Press
maybe because it's 2025 and not 1985. hope that helps.
September 18, 2025 at 6:11 PM
maybe because it's 2025 and not 1985. hope that helps.
you think he's an ally?
September 18, 2025 at 3:29 AM
you think he's an ally?
you are an insane loser.
September 18, 2025 at 3:08 AM
you are an insane loser.
sad, you weren't able to answer a single simple question about your own belief system. very weird to go through life this way. i feel bad for you.
September 16, 2025 at 2:53 AM
sad, you weren't able to answer a single simple question about your own belief system. very weird to go through life this way. i feel bad for you.
sorry that you are not able to separate observation from opinion. i suppose you think you have a consistent point of view. i'd love to understand how.
September 16, 2025 at 2:16 AM
sorry that you are not able to separate observation from opinion. i suppose you think you have a consistent point of view. i'd love to understand how.
there is no judgement, only observation. i asked a question and you got defensive, probably because you realize that you have no integrity. you condemn israel while tirelessly defending AIPAC schumer. you would rather leave the country than vote in opposition of fascism. you believe in nothing.
September 16, 2025 at 2:10 AM
there is no judgement, only observation. i asked a question and you got defensive, probably because you realize that you have no integrity. you condemn israel while tirelessly defending AIPAC schumer. you would rather leave the country than vote in opposition of fascism. you believe in nothing.
abstaining in this political climate says a lot about a person's character. so does caping this hard for chuck schumer in 2025. do your principles only exist in a bubble or do you plan to engage with the current reality at any point? what would it take?
September 16, 2025 at 1:32 AM
abstaining in this political climate says a lot about a person's character. so does caping this hard for chuck schumer in 2025. do your principles only exist in a bubble or do you plan to engage with the current reality at any point? what would it take?
who are you voting for instead? cuomo, silwa, adams, or abstaining?
September 16, 2025 at 1:17 AM
who are you voting for instead? cuomo, silwa, adams, or abstaining?
sopranos spec script dialogue
May 8, 2025 at 11:40 PM
sopranos spec script dialogue
didn't respond to a single question and sent this idiotic response. congrats. just say tank top man makes you laugh, obviously that's all that matters.
April 1, 2025 at 5:17 PM
didn't respond to a single question and sent this idiotic response. congrats. just say tank top man makes you laugh, obviously that's all that matters.
didn't respond to a single question and sent this idiotic response. congrats. just say tank top man makes you laugh, obviously that's all that matters.
April 1, 2025 at 5:05 PM
didn't respond to a single question and sent this idiotic response. congrats. just say tank top man makes you laugh, obviously that's all that matters.
so all of them are bad, or all of them are good and only the athletic is bad? who are you caping for because you personally like them? and again, did you read the piece? it calls out that mcafee is not the only one who blew this up, but that he has the biggest platform.
April 1, 2025 at 4:56 PM
so all of them are bad, or all of them are good and only the athletic is bad? who are you caping for because you personally like them? and again, did you read the piece? it calls out that mcafee is not the only one who blew this up, but that he has the biggest platform.
hey goofy, did you even read the article? even if it's 99% sports banter and 1% questionable shit that ruins someone's life, that's too much. or is this just a "it doesn't affect me personally so it's ok" take? what if was your daughter whose life was being ruined over a sick rumor? does that help?
April 1, 2025 at 4:51 PM
hey goofy, did you even read the article? even if it's 99% sports banter and 1% questionable shit that ruins someone's life, that's too much. or is this just a "it doesn't affect me personally so it's ok" take? what if was your daughter whose life was being ruined over a sick rumor? does that help?
pat mcafee is not going to have sex with you
April 1, 2025 at 1:48 PM
pat mcafee is not going to have sex with you
"paying you tuesday for two hamburgers today is the biggest ponzi scheme of all time"
March 4, 2025 at 11:00 PM
"paying you tuesday for two hamburgers today is the biggest ponzi scheme of all time"
i appreciate you sending this over, i actually do watch thinking basketball. i agree with a lot of his points but i think he's targeting people with 90s nostalgia. i think ~2005-2015 is the golden era, before the three pointer exploded. the mix of styles and looks across the league peaks there.
February 27, 2025 at 6:26 PM
i appreciate you sending this over, i actually do watch thinking basketball. i agree with a lot of his points but i think he's targeting people with 90s nostalgia. i think ~2005-2015 is the golden era, before the three pointer exploded. the mix of styles and looks across the league peaks there.
it's not about the distance or quantity, it's about how the shot is produced. if all nba offenses were designed to drive and kick out for a 21 ft two, that is also boring. if every shot was a dunk, that would also be boring. a variety of styles and looks improve the quality of the product.
February 27, 2025 at 4:52 PM
it's not about the distance or quantity, it's about how the shot is produced. if all nba offenses were designed to drive and kick out for a 21 ft two, that is also boring. if every shot was a dunk, that would also be boring. a variety of styles and looks improve the quality of the product.
the answer is simple: variety is good. a mix of threes and twos, offense and defense, inside and outside, etc. is more entertaining than the same thing over and over again (postups OR threes). offensive efficiency is a factor but not the only factor, which seems to be lost on modern fans.
February 27, 2025 at 3:56 PM
the answer is simple: variety is good. a mix of threes and twos, offense and defense, inside and outside, etc. is more entertaining than the same thing over and over again (postups OR threes). offensive efficiency is a factor but not the only factor, which seems to be lost on modern fans.
sure, im agreeing with you. my point is that the league has 75 champions, ranking that team in the 30-50 range feels "safe." top 10 will trigger people. 11-29 is a conversation. and it would be interesting to evaluate what other finals losers also make it into those rankings ahead of champions.
February 24, 2025 at 8:31 PM
sure, im agreeing with you. my point is that the league has 75 champions, ranking that team in the 30-50 range feels "safe." top 10 will trigger people. 11-29 is a conversation. and it would be interesting to evaluate what other finals losers also make it into those rankings ahead of champions.
how high on the all time team rankings can a team climb without having won the title that year? people get triggered by the term "all time" because it infers exclusivity, like a top 10 ranking. probably less of a trigger if you mean top 30-50.
February 24, 2025 at 8:16 PM
how high on the all time team rankings can a team climb without having won the title that year? people get triggered by the term "all time" because it infers exclusivity, like a top 10 ranking. probably less of a trigger if you mean top 30-50.
are you saying that policy (whether governmental or by a private company like united healthcare) that will knowingly lead to death does not count as premeditated murder? reducing mangione's act to "political violence" is a far more radical take than celebrating it as an act of self defense.
February 23, 2025 at 7:15 PM
are you saying that policy (whether governmental or by a private company like united healthcare) that will knowingly lead to death does not count as premeditated murder? reducing mangione's act to "political violence" is a far more radical take than celebrating it as an act of self defense.