Mark Be Busy
@journeymansalvager.bsky.social
🏳️🌈 he/him | Reader, writer, baker, climber, carpenter, gardener, and a host of other minor hobbies when ADHD lets me focus on them.
Reposted by Mark Be Busy
Encouraging info from CM Chavez. My issue here is that the entire history of Big Tech is doing illegal things and daring people to stop them, which rarely happens. We need to say a robot can't drive AND provide a framework for strong penalties when the companies inevitably ignore that law.
My understanding is that state law requires a human driver.
According to MPR, Waymo hired lobbyists to explore the possibility of changing state laws to allow for the operation of autonomous vehicles.
I’d be supportive of an ordinance that requires a human to be physically present.
According to MPR, Waymo hired lobbyists to explore the possibility of changing state laws to allow for the operation of autonomous vehicles.
I’d be supportive of an ordinance that requires a human to be physically present.
November 16, 2025 at 11:23 PM
Encouraging info from CM Chavez. My issue here is that the entire history of Big Tech is doing illegal things and daring people to stop them, which rarely happens. We need to say a robot can't drive AND provide a framework for strong penalties when the companies inevitably ignore that law.
I mean, it looks a lot like a cat's paw tool - a carpenter's tool to help remove nails from close-in spaces.
October 20, 2025 at 9:19 PM
I mean, it looks a lot like a cat's paw tool - a carpenter's tool to help remove nails from close-in spaces.
Pretty sure I only had a clue about question #2 because I listen to the Revolutions podcast. 😅
October 19, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Pretty sure I only had a clue about question #2 because I listen to the Revolutions podcast. 😅