• I checked all modding communities I am in, you didn't ask about feedback on those standards in any of them.

Idk how you can try to establish community standards, without involving the community, those standards are for.
Rename them to something like "Our checklist", fix them, and I am fine.

• I am not fond of my images and descriptions being reposted on another website,
however Modrinth's TOS allows it, so I got to live with that.
• Your site doesn't have a noindex meta tag on project pages,
meaning that it directly competes with Modrinth for SEO.
2/?

I am sorry if I seem rude, that isn't my intention.

However, I am annoyed at this:
• The score is designed in such a way, that a low score seems like something bad
• The standards seem like something official, generally agreed upon
• Additionally, some of them don't seem to work correctly
1/?

Like, it's not a standard for a mod to be open source, even if some people wish it to be. Nor does it make sense to have images for a utility (unless you want those shiny 4k config file screenshots). Should I also be lying about categories only to have more than 1?

I ducking love this, great work and Idea!

So I come to ask for help.
If you enjoy any of my or bysco's mods and can and want to support us keeping my head above water please consider supporting me/us via my kofi ko-fi.com/shynieke

If you do end up supporting and want the supporter reward in Statues try to include your mc name somewhere.

Oh right, you can find it on CF and Modrinth! www.curseforge.com/minecraft/mc...
modrinth.com/mod/critter-...

I think it would also work with the ammend, but you'd have to check out that specific commit for that.

Oh nevermind, sorry second last. That's possible to, but tbh I have no clue how to do it without a git gui app.

Iirc you can just rename it using "git commit --amend"
though if you already pushed to the remote, you'll need a force push to override the remote.

And before someone starts "But Pirate Software said" he critiqued goals that he made up. He worked for companies that are part of the problem.

It may be a bit vague, but it's not a final law.
Also don't worry, big companies have enough money to go lobbying, the law won't bankrupt them.

3/3 Up to a point where they are effectively indestructible. Durability might also become an "ingredient" in crafting. Allowing for e.g. more output, at the cost of the station loosing more durability. I am not fully certain, but will surely slowly experiment with it.

2/? With my current test I am going in-between 9k and 10k crafts before you need to "repair" it. I doubt any player would ever reach that in single player. Additionally for other crafting stations, that might need more regular maintenance, I could add various upgrades to extend their durability.