Void in a Cardigan
@jumbledcardigan.bsky.social
(They/She) Queer. Contract Outreach Librarian at a research library. Cat lover (rip my bb), Cardigan Wearer. Graphic Novel, webcomic, manga reader. Quilter, Book Maker, Sewist.
All opinions expressed are mine not my employers. Reposts ≠ endorsement
All opinions expressed are mine not my employers. Reposts ≠ endorsement
Forgot the img lol
November 26, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Forgot the img lol
Omg that looks so good
November 26, 2025 at 3:02 PM
Omg that looks so good
*redistricting
Auto correct 🤦
Auto correct 🤦
November 26, 2025 at 3:34 AM
*redistricting
Auto correct 🤦
Auto correct 🤦
I would like to mention it’s policy we aren’t allowed to use ChatGPT on work machines. Which means they’re doing it on personal devices and we’ve been told that’s totally fine! Just “no PII or sensitive/private data inputs pls”
November 25, 2025 at 10:36 PM
I would like to mention it’s policy we aren’t allowed to use ChatGPT on work machines. Which means they’re doing it on personal devices and we’ve been told that’s totally fine! Just “no PII or sensitive/private data inputs pls”
I am 100% expect the director to line up the staff analysis with the genAI one and compare them. “Just for funsies” 🤡
“Just to see what it can do ya know.”
I’m sure there’s no way looking at an in depth genAI analysis will influence the decisions of ppl who love using genAI /s 🙄
“Just to see what it can do ya know.”
I’m sure there’s no way looking at an in depth genAI analysis will influence the decisions of ppl who love using genAI /s 🙄
November 25, 2025 at 10:36 PM
I am 100% expect the director to line up the staff analysis with the genAI one and compare them. “Just for funsies” 🤡
“Just to see what it can do ya know.”
I’m sure there’s no way looking at an in depth genAI analysis will influence the decisions of ppl who love using genAI /s 🙄
“Just to see what it can do ya know.”
I’m sure there’s no way looking at an in depth genAI analysis will influence the decisions of ppl who love using genAI /s 🙄
Oh don’t worry supposedly the ChatGPT analysis won’t be used to make any official decisions.
The staff analysis (done by 2ppl, why idk) will be used for all official decisions (whatever that means)
The staff analysis (done by 2ppl, why idk) will be used for all official decisions (whatever that means)
November 25, 2025 at 10:36 PM
Oh don’t worry supposedly the ChatGPT analysis won’t be used to make any official decisions.
The staff analysis (done by 2ppl, why idk) will be used for all official decisions (whatever that means)
The staff analysis (done by 2ppl, why idk) will be used for all official decisions (whatever that means)
^edited to remove keywords
But WHYYY
Also how does an the language model define and algorithmically decide what is “credible”
Also I wonder if in the future we’re going to have issues of genAI always only citing the same sources leading something like citation inflation for some papers.
But WHYYY
Also how does an the language model define and algorithmically decide what is “credible”
Also I wonder if in the future we’re going to have issues of genAI always only citing the same sources leading something like citation inflation for some papers.
November 18, 2025 at 1:10 PM
^edited to remove keywords
But WHYYY
Also how does an the language model define and algorithmically decide what is “credible”
Also I wonder if in the future we’re going to have issues of genAI always only citing the same sources leading something like citation inflation for some papers.
But WHYYY
Also how does an the language model define and algorithmically decide what is “credible”
Also I wonder if in the future we’re going to have issues of genAI always only citing the same sources leading something like citation inflation for some papers.
Seeing conversations from librarians about teaching students to generate their references for their papers.
I read an example where they gave perplex*ty the prompt of “find credible clinical studies that conducted trials with the use of ____ and or ____. Ensure the literature is credible”
I read an example where they gave perplex*ty the prompt of “find credible clinical studies that conducted trials with the use of ____ and or ____. Ensure the literature is credible”
November 18, 2025 at 1:10 PM
Seeing conversations from librarians about teaching students to generate their references for their papers.
I read an example where they gave perplex*ty the prompt of “find credible clinical studies that conducted trials with the use of ____ and or ____. Ensure the literature is credible”
I read an example where they gave perplex*ty the prompt of “find credible clinical studies that conducted trials with the use of ____ and or ____. Ensure the literature is credible”
Suuuuper weird
November 10, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Suuuuper weird
That’s really cute looking!
November 10, 2025 at 3:29 PM
That’s really cute looking!