KazMac
@kazmac.bsky.social
Adult human female. Here for the craic 🧐
One case of VAWG? I’m unclear what you are referring to.
April 17, 2025 at 10:10 PM
One case of VAWG? I’m unclear what you are referring to.
OMG that old chestnut 🤣🤣 Ta ta 👋
April 17, 2025 at 7:14 PM
OMG that old chestnut 🤣🤣 Ta ta 👋
Of course they’re human. Aren’t we all? What well known hate group would that be then 🤨
April 17, 2025 at 7:04 PM
Of course they’re human. Aren’t we all? What well known hate group would that be then 🤨
The problem of VAWG is men, regardless of what they wear or how they see themselves. MEN. We can’t distinguish good from bad so we ask all men to stay out.
April 17, 2025 at 6:55 PM
The problem of VAWG is men, regardless of what they wear or how they see themselves. MEN. We can’t distinguish good from bad so we ask all men to stay out.
We’re not crying mate and it’s not us ‘attacking’ anyone. We’re too busy protecting women’s (see Supreme Court Judgement) rights, oh and celebrating. Chin, chin 🥂
April 17, 2025 at 6:13 PM
We’re not crying mate and it’s not us ‘attacking’ anyone. We’re too busy protecting women’s (see Supreme Court Judgement) rights, oh and celebrating. Chin, chin 🥂
Reposted by KazMac
Nope.
We are not 'critics of trans rights'.
We support 'trans rights' to protection from harassment & discrimination on the basis of 'gender reassignment'.
But not the rights of males/men to females/women's rights.
bsky.app/profile/wome...
We are not 'critics of trans rights'.
We support 'trans rights' to protection from harassment & discrimination on the basis of 'gender reassignment'.
But not the rights of males/men to females/women's rights.
bsky.app/profile/wome...
'Five judges from the UK supreme court ruled unanimously that the legal definition of a woman in the Equality Act 2010 did not include transgender women who hold gender recognition certificates (GRCs).'
💃🍸💃
www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
💃🍸💃
www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Gender critical campaigners win at UK supreme court over definition of woman
Judges rule that Equality Act definition excludes transgender women holding gender recognition certificates
www.theguardian.com
April 16, 2025 at 11:11 AM
Nope.
We are not 'critics of trans rights'.
We support 'trans rights' to protection from harassment & discrimination on the basis of 'gender reassignment'.
But not the rights of males/men to females/women's rights.
bsky.app/profile/wome...
We are not 'critics of trans rights'.
We support 'trans rights' to protection from harassment & discrimination on the basis of 'gender reassignment'.
But not the rights of males/men to females/women's rights.
bsky.app/profile/wome...