As an oldtimer of Solid but newcomer to AT proto, it seems that AT proto is an RPC protocol, while Solid is near-REST. Solid seems to have a more general scope. Unfortunately, I think Solid is rather dead at this point. Happy to help pillaging it for parts though.

Mitt høringssvar til Digital Services Act slik det er foreslått innført til Norge: www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumente... Jeg prøver å adressere noen misforståelser, bare.

I argue that @jonathanhaidt.bsky.social 's laser-focus on phones and age limits have had a very detrimental impact on the debate we really need to have, the need to completely replace the platforms. I have summarized my thoughts on my blog: kjetil.kjernsmo.net/2025/09/jona...

Når de politiske partiene bedrev reklame på Meta sine plattformer, f.eks. Facebook og Instagram, så sier partiene at det ikke er ulovlig atferdsbasert reklame fordi de bare begrenser på geografi? Men betyr det at det ikke er basert på personopplysninger? Nei, mener jeg.

So, I assert that we have had reason for building deliberative spaces for 25 years now, it is not a recent development.

"the expansion of the public sphere through the Internet requires not only developing deliberative spaces but also attracting participation from citizens who have been socialized within a commercialized and individualized culture hostile towards public deliberation." -- Lincoln Dahlberg 2001:

I anledning at høringsfristen for aldersgrense på sosiale medier er i dag, poster jeg et innlegg fra i fjor om det: kjetil.kjernsmo.net/2024/10/fra-... Departementet ønsker å skape synergier ved at misbrukerne selv får bestemme hvordan alderen skal verifiseres.

Free speech isn't simply a protection against censorship. A better way to think of it is as a capability: a substantive ability to participate in public discourse.

This requires a safe, open, enlightened information environment. The Norwegian constitution gets that: lovdata.no/dokument/NLE...