@kjme12.bsky.social
Reposted
Yes. Eventually. As long as most of us don't normalize this fucking behavior.
I just love how this week's episode of South Park portrayed boy Pete.
This article gives good summary of it.
I just love how this week's episode of South Park portrayed boy Pete.
This article gives good summary of it.
‘South Park’ Humiliates ‘F***ing D*****bag’ Pete Hegseth
South Park depicted Hegseth as a total poser.
www.thedailybeast.com
November 28, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Yes. Eventually. As long as most of us don't normalize this fucking behavior.
I just love how this week's episode of South Park portrayed boy Pete.
This article gives good summary of it.
I just love how this week's episode of South Park portrayed boy Pete.
This article gives good summary of it.
Our DOJ is not ours. It is Trump's legal team. Our only hope is that Congress becomes overwhelmingly blue in the next election. As a Republican operative now owns Dominion (the voting machines), it is very doubtful that we will have fair elections.
November 29, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Our DOJ is not ours. It is Trump's legal team. Our only hope is that Congress becomes overwhelmingly blue in the next election. As a Republican operative now owns Dominion (the voting machines), it is very doubtful that we will have fair elections.
Reposted
Article 92 of the UCMJ addresses the failure to obey lawful orders and regulations, but also states that service members have a duty to refuse unlawful orders. An unlawful order is one that is illegal, violates the Constitution or U.S. law, or is not issued by an authorized person.
November 28, 2025 at 8:55 PM
Article 92 of the UCMJ addresses the failure to obey lawful orders and regulations, but also states that service members have a duty to refuse unlawful orders. An unlawful order is one that is illegal, violates the Constitution or U.S. law, or is not issued by an authorized person.
Reposted
@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social
"I would call Pete Hegseth a war criminal, but we aren’t at war. He’s just a mass murderer."
"I would call Pete Hegseth a war criminal, but we aren’t at war. He’s just a mass murderer."
November 28, 2025 at 9:20 PM
@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social
"I would call Pete Hegseth a war criminal, but we aren’t at war. He’s just a mass murderer."
"I would call Pete Hegseth a war criminal, but we aren’t at war. He’s just a mass murderer."
He is worse than scum.
November 29, 2025 at 12:29 AM
He is worse than scum.
He should be expedited to Venezuela to face criminal charges.
November 29, 2025 at 12:27 AM
He should be expedited to Venezuela to face criminal charges.
Reposted
America is becoming a rogue, pariah state.
Murdering in cold blood people who are zero immediate threat.
Allies have STOPPED SHARING intel with America.
There will be condemnation.
There MUST BE consequences.
Murdering in cold blood people who are zero immediate threat.
Allies have STOPPED SHARING intel with America.
There will be condemnation.
There MUST BE consequences.
November 28, 2025 at 8:51 PM
America is becoming a rogue, pariah state.
Murdering in cold blood people who are zero immediate threat.
Allies have STOPPED SHARING intel with America.
There will be condemnation.
There MUST BE consequences.
Murdering in cold blood people who are zero immediate threat.
Allies have STOPPED SHARING intel with America.
There will be condemnation.
There MUST BE consequences.
Why is Trump pardoning drug kingpins if they feel so strongly about this? Forgpget the fact that this is a crime punishable by jail time, not death.
November 29, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Why is Trump pardoning drug kingpins if they feel so strongly about this? Forgpget the fact that this is a crime punishable by jail time, not death.
They should be prosecuted for this. It is out and out murder.
November 29, 2025 at 12:23 AM
They should be prosecuted for this. It is out and out murder.
The ICC should prosecute Noem for ethnic cleansing. They know our country won't do anything about it.
November 29, 2025 at 12:22 AM
The ICC should prosecute Noem for ethnic cleansing. They know our country won't do anything about it.
Because shareholders are more important than the people paying for insurance. No one needs to make what these assholes make. We need caps on C suite salaries. They haven't earned the right to those salaries.
November 29, 2025 at 12:20 AM
Because shareholders are more important than the people paying for insurance. No one needs to make what these assholes make. We need caps on C suite salaries. They haven't earned the right to those salaries.
Reposted
And then there's the Healthcare companies CEO's. www.fiercehealthcare.com/special-repo...
UnitedHealth CEO Andrew Witty was 2024's highest-paid payer CEO. Here's a look at what other execs earned
The health insurance industry has weathered notable headwinds over the past year, but that didn't prevent company CEOs from taking home hefty paychecks in 2024.The CEOs of the six major national healt...
www.fiercehealthcare.com
November 28, 2025 at 8:57 PM
And then there's the Healthcare companies CEO's. www.fiercehealthcare.com/special-repo...
Reposted
Vote for Aftyn Behn right now during early voting for Tennessee's special election. She will help keep your energy utilities bills down. See next post.
November 28, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Vote for Aftyn Behn right now during early voting for Tennessee's special election. She will help keep your energy utilities bills down. See next post.
Reposted
We need my Corporate Hierarchy Income Tethering (CHIT) law:
No company may compensate anyone on its payroll more than 50x what its lowest-paid full-time employee is paid.
If it wants to pay its CEO $500M/yr, it's gonna pay its janitor $10M/yr.
Don't wanna pay Willie > $30K? CEO gets $150K.
1/
No company may compensate anyone on its payroll more than 50x what its lowest-paid full-time employee is paid.
If it wants to pay its CEO $500M/yr, it's gonna pay its janitor $10M/yr.
Don't wanna pay Willie > $30K? CEO gets $150K.
1/
November 28, 2025 at 9:01 PM
We need my Corporate Hierarchy Income Tethering (CHIT) law:
No company may compensate anyone on its payroll more than 50x what its lowest-paid full-time employee is paid.
If it wants to pay its CEO $500M/yr, it's gonna pay its janitor $10M/yr.
Don't wanna pay Willie > $30K? CEO gets $150K.
1/
No company may compensate anyone on its payroll more than 50x what its lowest-paid full-time employee is paid.
If it wants to pay its CEO $500M/yr, it's gonna pay its janitor $10M/yr.
Don't wanna pay Willie > $30K? CEO gets $150K.
1/
Reposted
Amen! The super wealthy need to be taxed enough, to pay anyone’s taxes under $500k, with assets under $1m.
The whole idea of billionaires wealth isn’t just grotesque, it is immoral. Tax them retroactively and give the working class a fucking break!
The whole idea of billionaires wealth isn’t just grotesque, it is immoral. Tax them retroactively and give the working class a fucking break!
a woman says " tax the rich " while wearing a maroon suit
ALT: a woman says " tax the rich " while wearing a maroon suit
media.tenor.com
November 28, 2025 at 11:03 PM
Amen! The super wealthy need to be taxed enough, to pay anyone’s taxes under $500k, with assets under $1m.
The whole idea of billionaires wealth isn’t just grotesque, it is immoral. Tax them retroactively and give the working class a fucking break!
The whole idea of billionaires wealth isn’t just grotesque, it is immoral. Tax them retroactively and give the working class a fucking break!
Reposted
Time for wealth limits. Require any options to be discounted by 80 percent for reinvestment into the company. Base minimum wage .1 percent of CEO wages. For instance a CEO that makes 50,000,000.00 a year. That would mean he makes roughly 24,000.00 per hour. So I guess the minimum wage is $24/hour.
November 28, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Time for wealth limits. Require any options to be discounted by 80 percent for reinvestment into the company. Base minimum wage .1 percent of CEO wages. For instance a CEO that makes 50,000,000.00 a year. That would mean he makes roughly 24,000.00 per hour. So I guess the minimum wage is $24/hour.
Reposted
Taxes: takes care of education of your employees, roads, police, and many more things that create everything a company needs to function. And they don't want to contribute to that!
November 28, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Taxes: takes care of education of your employees, roads, police, and many more things that create everything a company needs to function. And they don't want to contribute to that!
Reposted
Yes. All of those things used to be the case before corporate PAC$, Nixon, Newt Gingrich, Ronbo Reagan et al rolled back progress. 😡
I recommend Robert Reich’s excellent book, “Coming Up Short, A Memoir of My America” 👍🏻👏🏻👍🏻💙🇺🇸💙
I recommend Robert Reich’s excellent book, “Coming Up Short, A Memoir of My America” 👍🏻👏🏻👍🏻💙🇺🇸💙
November 28, 2025 at 8:49 PM
Yes. All of those things used to be the case before corporate PAC$, Nixon, Newt Gingrich, Ronbo Reagan et al rolled back progress. 😡
I recommend Robert Reich’s excellent book, “Coming Up Short, A Memoir of My America” 👍🏻👏🏻👍🏻💙🇺🇸💙
I recommend Robert Reich’s excellent book, “Coming Up Short, A Memoir of My America” 👍🏻👏🏻👍🏻💙🇺🇸💙
Reposted
Tax the rich, close the loopholes, hike the capital gains tax, remove the social security tax cap, enact a minimal wealth tax, and increase the corporate tax rate. Jail the owners using immigrants for slave labor. Tax the billionaires like it's 1950.
November 28, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Tax the rich, close the loopholes, hike the capital gains tax, remove the social security tax cap, enact a minimal wealth tax, and increase the corporate tax rate. Jail the owners using immigrants for slave labor. Tax the billionaires like it's 1950.
Reposted
And then there are billionaire-profit companies that rely on US taxpayers to give their underpaid employees money for food. www.bostonglobe.com/2025/11/28/m...
‘The government is subsidizing corporate profits’: Who employs the most SNAP recipients in Massachusetts? - The Boston Globe
In Massachusetts, 74 percent of working-age SNAP recipients have jobs.
www.bostonglobe.com
November 28, 2025 at 8:29 PM
And then there are billionaire-profit companies that rely on US taxpayers to give their underpaid employees money for food. www.bostonglobe.com/2025/11/28/m...
Reposted
A few days’ boycott won’t bring down the oligarchy, but at least it will send them strong message. We are in control!
November 28, 2025 at 8:10 PM