No one knows ones research and its impact better than the researcher themselves. If they can't communicate that in an engaging way, I would strongly suggest they work with others who can. Artists, Advocates, SciComm specialists, or even others in ones field who can. 2

There are lots of calls from philsci and metascience for scientists to do things that will increase public trust in science- communicate more and better, do better studies, publish data and code. I think these calls are completely misguided 🧵

I'm sharing this call for papers for a SI focused on Emotions in Teaching Second Language Writing #AcademicWriting #L2teaching
www.sciencedirect.com/special-issu...

A recent UNESCO study reveals that many digital content creators do not fact-check their information and speaks of the need to teach critical thinking skills #ScienceCommunication #CriticalThinking #DigitalGenres
unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/p...

Author here: 100% real. That's very easy to check for yourself, we took Scopus/Web of Science publicly available data.

Should you want to replicate the analysis here you get a step by step guide with all the details: the-strain-on-scientific-publishing.github.io/website/post...

As a grant reviewer, what do you really wish people would do/not do?

Not big things, like find a significant question/innovative method/be consistent with aims

Little things, like bold each acronym the first time it’s used.

Add your pet peeves ⬇️
#HiddenCurriculum #Research